ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2023
Impact of modified bladder neck suspension on early recovery of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Total periurethral reconstruction with preservation of "Hood" structures promotes early recovery of urinary continence in extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Short-Term Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy Is Still Based on Patients' Age, Nerve-Sparing Approach, and Surgical-Experience, Despite the Higher-Use of Robotic Surgery in 2022 Compared to 2016 Real-World Results of a Large Rehabilitation Center in Germany.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incontinence after RARP significantly decreases the quality of life in prostate cancer patients. A number of techniques have been introduced for the recovery of continence after RARP. Although, the mechanism of the continence recovery is still unclear. We aimed to evaluate the early recovery of continence after RARP by inducing early anterior adhesion and reducing the hypermobility of the urethra through the modified bladder neck suspension (BNS) procedure. From March 2018 to February 2020, a total of 227 consecutive patients who underwent RARP (by single surgeon) were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on operation procedure (Standard procedure vs BNS procedure). Demographics, perioperative variables, and pathologic outcome were analyzed. We assessed recovery of continence at 1, 3, 6 and 9 months after surgery. Postoperative recovery of continence defined as the use of no pad during 24 h. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate independent predictors of the early recovery of continence at 1 month. We performed RARP with standard procedure (n = 106) or BNS procedure (n = 121). There was no statistical difference in perioperative variables between the two groups except anastomosis time (21.6 ± 12.9 vs 17.0 ± 7.6, p = 0.003). The pad free continence rate were 80.2% (standard group) and 91.3% (BNS group) at 9 month after RARP (p = 0.037). However, early continence rate (1mo) were significantly higher in the BNS group (12.3% vs 29.1%, p = 0.004). On multivariate logistic analyses, BNS procedure (odds ratio [OR] 2.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-7.45, p = 0.0426), age (OR 0.92, CI 0.86-0.98, p = 0.0154) were independent factor for early recovery of continence after RARP. The modified bladder neck suspension procedure showed significantly better outcomes than the standard procedure in terms of the early recovery of urinary continence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.