Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37336821›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2023

Comparison of three massively parallel sequencing platforms for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping in forensic genetics.

Ran Li, Qiangwei Wang, Jingyi Yang, Jianzhang Zhu, Jiajun Liu, Riga Wu, Hongyu Sun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ran LiFaculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6473-4570
Qiangwei WangFaculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Jingyi YangFaculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Jianzhang ZhuGuangzhou Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Jiajun LiuFaculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Riga WuFaculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Hongyu SunFaculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China. sunhy@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5926-4495
Sun Yat-sen University · CNGuangzhou Eighth People's Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81971798National Natural Science Foundation of China 82293655Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2019A1515011527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three MPS platforms are being used in forensic genetic analysis, i.e., MiSeq FGx, Ion S5 XL, and MGISEQ-2000. However, few studies compared their performance. In this study, we sequenced 83 common SNPs of 71 samples using the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit on MiSeq FGx, the Precision ID Identity Panel on Ion S5 XL, and the MGIEasy Signature Identification Library Prep Kit on MGISEQ-2000 and then the performance was compared. Results showed that the MiSeq FGx had the highest sequence quality but the lowest sequencing depth and allele balance. Discordant genotypes were observed at six SNPs, which may be caused by variants at primer binding regions, indel errors, or misalignments. Besides, two kinds of background noises, allele-specific miscalled reads (ASMR) and allele-nonspecific miscalled reads (ANMR), were characterized. MGISEQ-2000 showed the highest level of ASMR while Ion S5 XL had the highest level of ANMR. Site- and genotype-dependent miscalled patterns were observed at several SNPs on Ion S5 XL and MGISEQ-2000, but few on MiSeq FGx. In conclusion, the three MPS platforms perform differently with respect to sequencing quality, sequencing depth, allele balance, concordance, and background noise. These findings may be useful for data comparison, mixture deconvolution, and heteroplasmy analysis in forensic genetics.

Indexed as

Forensic GeneticsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA FingerprintingGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, DNAComparisonIon S5 XLMGISEQ-2000MiSeq FGxSingle nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)

Identifiers

PMID37336821
OpenAlexW4381188129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.