Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37336795›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2023

The role of intraoperative extensor digitorum brevis muscle MEPs in spinal surgery.

Paolo Costa, Alessandro Borio, Sonia Marmolino, Cristina Turco, Domenico Serpella, Elena Della Cerra, Elia Cipriano, Salvatore Ferlisi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 82% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paolo CostaDepartment of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Section of Clinical Neurophysiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, EU, Italy. pacst@fastwebnet.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3145-0760
Alessandro BorioDepartment of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Section of Clinical Neurophysiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, EU, Italy.
Sonia MarmolinoDepartment of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Section of Clinical Neurophysiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, EU, Italy.
Cristina TurcoDepartment of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Section of Clinical Neurophysiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, EU, Italy.
Domenico SerpellaDepartment of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Section of Clinical Neurophysiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, EU, Italy.
Elena Della CerraDepartment of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Section of Clinical Neurophysiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, EU, Italy.
Elia CiprianoDepartment of Translational Medicine, Section of Neurology, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
Salvatore FerlisiDepartment of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic (BiND), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntraoperative muscle motor evoked potentials (m-MEPs) are widely used in spinal surgery with the aim of identifying a damage to spinal cord at a reversible stage. Generally, lower limb m-MEPs are recorded from abductor hallucis [AH] and the tibialis anterior [TA]. The purpose of this work is to study an unselected population by recording the m-MEPs from TA, AH and extensor digitorum brevis (EDB), with the aim of identifying the most adjustable and stable muscles responses intraoperatively.

methodsTranscranially electrically induced m-MEPs were intraoperative recorded in a total of 107 surgical procedures. m-MEPs were recorded by a needle electrode placed in the muscle from TA, AH and EDB muscles in the lower extremities.

resultsOverall monitorability (i.e., at least 1 Lower Limb m-MEP recordable) was 100/107 (93.5%). In the remaining 100 surgeries in 3 cases, the only muscle that could be recorded at baseline was one AH, and in other 2 the EDB. Persistence (i.e., the recordability of m-MEP from baseline to the end of surgery) was 88.7% for TA, 89.8% for AH and 93.8% for EDB.

conclusionIn our series, EDB m-MEPs have demonstrated a recordability superior to TA and a stability similar to AH. The explanations may be different and range from changes in the excitability of the cortical motor neuron to the different sensitivity to ischemia of the spinal motor neuron. EDB can be used alternatively or can be added to TA and AH as a target muscle of the lower limb in spinal surgery.

Indexed as

Monitoring, IntraoperativeSpinal CordEvoked Potentials, MotorHumansMuscle, SkeletalNeurosurgical ProceduresSpineAbductor hallucisExtensor digitorum brevisIntraoperative muscle motor evoked potentialsSpine surgeryTibialis anterior

Identifiers

PMID37336795
OpenAlexW4381185958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.