ArticleThe Korean journal of pain2023
Comparison of modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through perichondral approach and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for pain management in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized-controlled trial.
Article in The Korean journal of pain, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerves Block Through the Perichondrial Approach vs Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Recovery After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Trial
- Thoracoabdominal nerves block through the perichondrial approach: a narrative review.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2026Review
- Ultrasound identification of absent rectus abdominis muscle after omphalocele repair altered regional anesthesia strategy in pediatric cardiac surgery: a case report.JA clinical reports · 2026Article
- Clinical Feasibility and Outcomes of Surgeon-Performed Laparoscopic-Guided Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Prospective Observational Study.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2026Observational
- Modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach for surgical patients: a scoping review.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Article
- Modified thoracoabdominal nerve block via perichondral approach: an alternative for perioperative pain management in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a middle-income country.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Article
- Continuous paravertebral block combined with multilevel single-shot intercostal nerve blocks for pain control after thoracotomy.Journal of anesthesia · 2024Article
- Comparing analgesic efficacy of different local blocks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: author's reply.The Korean journal of pain · 2023Article
- Comments on comparing analgesic efficacy of different local blocks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.The Korean journal of pain · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through the perichondral approach (M-TAPA) is a novel regional analgesic technique that can provide analgesia for both the lateral and anterior abdominal walls. This study aimed to compare the analgesic effect of M-TAPA with that of the subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods: Sixty patients scheduled to undergo elective LC were randomly assigned to receive either M-TAPA or subcostal TAPB during anesthesia induction. The primary outcome was the maximum pain intensity during movement within the first 12 hours postoperatively, measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included changes in NRS scores during rest, coughing, and movement, which were assessed at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively and immediately before discharge. Additionally, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patient satisfaction were recorded as secondary outcomes. Results: Data from 56 patients were analyzed, and no significant difference was observed in the primary outcome between the two groups (M-TAPA: 5.5 [interquartile range (IQR): 5-7] vs . subcostal TAPB: 5 [IQR: 4-7], median difference: 0, 95% confidence interval: -1 to 1, Conclusions: No significant difference was observed in the analgesic effect between the two techniques. Consequently, further research is necessary to compare the efficacy of M-TAPA with other well-established regional analgesic techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.