Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37336577›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology reviews2023

Physicochemical homeostasis in bacteria.

Bert Poolman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Osmotic stress triggers fast and reversible PMF collapse inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bert PoolmanDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Groningen, NL, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1455-531X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In living cells, the biochemical processes such as energy provision, molecule synthesis, gene expression, and cell division take place in a confined space where the internal chemical and physical conditions are different from those in dilute solutions. The concentrations of specific molecules and the specific reactions and interactions vary for different types of cells, but a number of factors are universal and kept within limits, which we refer to as physicochemical homeostasis. For instance, the internal pH of many cell types is kept within the range of 7.0 to 7.5, the fraction of macromolecules occupies 15%-20% of the cell volume (also known as macromolecular crowding) and the ionic strength is kept within limits to prevent salting-in or salting-out effects. In this article we summarize the generic physicochemical properties of the cytoplasm of bacteria, how they are connected to the energy status of the cell, and how they affect biological processes (Fig. 1). We describe how the internal pH and proton motive force are regulated, how the internal ionic strength is kept within limits, what the impact of macromolecular crowding is on the function of enzymes and the interaction between molecules, how cells regulate their volume (and turgor), and how the cytoplasm is structured. Physicochemical homeostasis is best understood in Escherichia coli, but pioneering studies have also been performed in lactic acid bacteria.

Indexed as

BacteriaCytoplasmHomeostasisMacromolecular SubstancesMacromolecular Substancesexcluded volumeinternal pHionic strengthlateral diffusionmacromolecular crowdingphysicochemical homeostasisstructure of cytoplasmvolume regulation

Identifiers

PMID37336577
PMCPMC10368375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.