Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37336539›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Impact of remuneration, extrinsic and intrinsic incentives on interprofessional primary care teams: protocol for a rapid scoping review.

Monica Aggarwal, Brian Hutchison, Kristina Marie Kokorelias, Kavita Mehta, Leslie Greenberg, Kimberly Moran, David Barber, Kevin Samson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Monica AggarwalDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada monica.aggarwal@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8455-0058
Brian HutchisonDepartment of Family Medicine, Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Kristina Marie KokoreliasDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Sinai Health and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1277-472X
Kavita MehtaAssociation of Family Health Teams of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Leslie GreenbergOntario College of Family Physicians, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kimberly MoranOntario College of Family Physicians, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David BarberDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Kevin SamsonEast Wellington Family Health Team, Erin/Rockwood, Ontario, Canada.
College of Family Physicians of Canada · CAEast Wellington Family Health Team · CAImpact · CAOntario Medical Association · CAQueen's University · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInterprofessional teams and funding and payment provider arrangements are key attributes of high-performing primary care. Several Canadian jurisdictions have introduced team-based models with different payment models. Despite these investments, the evidence of impact is mixed. This has raised questions about whether team-based primary care models are being implemented to facilitate team collaboration and effectiveness. Thus, we present a protocol for a rapid scoping review to systematically map, synthesise and summarise the existing literature on the impact of provider remuneration mechanisms and extrinsic and intrinsic incentives in team-based primary care. This review will answer three research questions: (1) What is the impact of provider remuneration models on team, patient, provider and system outcomes in primary care?; (2) What extrinsic and intrinsic incentives have been used in interprofessional primary care teams?; and (3) What is the impact of extrinsic and intrinsic team-based incentives on team, patient, provider and system outcomes? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a rapid scoping review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines. We will search electronic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EconLit) and grey literature sources (Google Scholar, Google). This review will consider all empirical studies and full-text English-language articles published between 2000 and 2022. Reviewers will independently perform the literature search, data extraction and synthesis of included studies. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool will be used to appraise the quality of evidence. The literature will be synthesised, summarised and mapped to themes that answer the research question of this review. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required. Findings from this study will be written for publication in an open-access peer-review journal and presented at national and international conferences. Knowledge users are part of the research team and will assist with disseminating findings to the public, clinicians, funders and professional associations.

Indexed as

MotivationRemunerationCanadaHumansPrimary Health CareResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicHealth policyHEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENTPRIMARY CARE

Identifiers

PMID37336539
PMCPMC10314533
OpenAlexW4381189995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.