Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37335935›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2023

Lessons from relatives: C4 photosynthesis enhances CO2 assimilation during the low-light phase of fluctuations.

Lucίa Arce Cubas, Cristina Rodrigues Gabriel Sales, Richard L Vath, Emmanuel L Bernardo, Angela C Burnett, Johannes Kromdijk

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Faster relaxation of nonphotochemical quenching in C4 than in C3 species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Estimating COBMC plant biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lucίa Arce CubasDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EA Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0200-0832
Cristina Rodrigues Gabriel SalesDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EA Cambridge, UK.
Richard L VathDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EA Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3641-5967
Emmanuel L BernardoDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EA Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3263-6639
Angela C BurnettDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EA Cambridge, UK.
Johannes KromdijkDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EA Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4423-4100
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of the Philippines Los Baños · PH

Funding

BBSRC BB/T007583/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the global importance of species with C4 photosynthesis, there is a lack of consensus regarding C4 performance under fluctuating light. Contrasting hypotheses and experimental evidence suggest that C4 photosynthesis is either less or more efficient in fixing carbon under fluctuating light than the ancestral C3 form. Two main issues have been identified that may underly the lack of consensus: neglect of evolutionary distance between selected C3 and C4 species and use of contrasting fluctuating light treatments. To circumvent these issues, we measured photosynthetic responses to fluctuating light across 3 independent phylogenetically controlled comparisons between C3 and C4 species from Alloteropsis, Flaveria, and Cleome genera under 21% and 2% O2. Leaves were subjected to repetitive stepwise changes in light intensity (800 and 100 µmol m-2 s-1 photon flux density) with 3 contrasting durations: 6, 30, and 300 s. These experiments reconciled the opposing results found across previous studies and showed that (i) stimulation of CO2 assimilation in C4 species during the low-light phase was both stronger and more sustained than in C3 species; (ii) CO2 assimilation patterns during the high-light phase could be attributable to species or C4 subtype differences rather than photosynthetic pathway; and (iii) the duration of each light step in the fluctuation regime can strongly influence experimental outcomes.

Indexed as

Carbon DioxidePhotosynthesisCarbonLightPlant LeavesPoaceaeCarbonCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID37335935
PMCPMC10517189
OpenAlexW4381192983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.