Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37335857›Full record

SynthesisNutrition reviews2024

Barriers and facilitators to implementation of healthy food and drink policies in public sector workplaces: a systematic literature review.

Magda Rosin, Sally Mackay, Sarah Gerritsen, Lisa Te Morenga, Gareth Terry, Cliona Ni Mhurchu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrition reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Magda RosinSchool of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-4542-3539
Sally MackaySchool of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-4135-6738
Sarah GerritsenSchool of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8365-5023
Lisa Te MorengaResearch Centre for Hauora and Health, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3526-0091
Gareth TerrySchool of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-6377-6194
Cliona Ni MhurchuNational Institute for Health Innovation, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1144-9167

Funding

Healthier Lives National Science ChallengeHealthY Policy EvaluationNational District Health Board Food and Drink Environments NetworkNational Healthy Food and Drink PolicyRoyal Society of New Zealand Rutherford Discovery Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextMany countries and institutions have adopted policies to promote healthier food and drink availability in various settings, including public sector workplaces.

objectiveThe objective of this review was to systematically synthesize evidence on barriers and facilitators to implementation of and compliance with healthy food and drink policies aimed at the general adult population in public sector workplaces. DATA SOURCES: Nine scientific databases, 9 grey literature sources, and government websites in key English-speaking countries along with reference lists. DATA EXTRACTION: All identified records (N = 8559) were assessed for eligibility. Studies reporting on barriers and facilitators were included irrespective of study design and methods used but were excluded if they were published before 2000 or in a non-English language. DATA ANALYSIS: Forty-one studies were eligible for inclusion, mainly from Australia, the United States, and Canada. The most common workplace settings were healthcare facilities, sports and recreation centers, and government agencies. Interviews and surveys were the predominant methods of data collection. Methodological aspects were assessed with the Critical Appraisal Skills Program Qualitative Studies Checklist. Generally, there was poor reporting of data collection and analysis methods. Thematic synthesis identified 4 themes: (1) a ratified policy as the foundation of a successful implementation plan; (2) food providers' acceptance of implementation is rooted in positive stakeholder relationships, recognizing opportunities, and taking ownership; (3) creating customer demand for healthier options may relieve tension between policy objectives and business goals; and (4) food supply may limit the ability of food providers to implement the policy.

conclusionsFindings suggest that although vendors encounter challenges, there are also factors that support healthy food and drink policy implementation in public sector workplaces. Understanding barriers and facilitators to successful policy implementation will significantly benefit stakeholders interested or engaging in healthy food and drink policy development and implementation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021246340.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyNutrition PolicyWorkplaceAustraliaBeveragesCanadaHealth PromotionHumansPublic Sectorbarrierchallengeenablerfacilitatorfood environmenthealthy food policyimplementationworkplace

Identifiers

PMID37335857
PMCPMC10925903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.