SynthesisRheumatology (Oxford, England)2023
Systemic pharmacological treatment of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: a systematic literature review.
Synthesis in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biological effects of statins in systemic sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 323 patients.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Adaptation and validation of the scleroderma skin patient-reported outcome questionnaire into Hungarian.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- What is the treatment pattern of juvenile systemic sclerosis? Results from an international cohort.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2026Article
- Treatment recommendations for the systemic pharmacological treatment of systemic sclerosis digital ulcers: Results from the World Scleroderma Foundation Ad Hoc Committee.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2025Article
- The predictive value of anti-IFI16 antibodies for the development or persistence of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Endothelin-1 as a Candidate Biomarker of Systemic Sclerosis: A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Meta-Regression.Biomarker insights · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 20 institutions in 11 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the evidence concerning systemic pharmacological treatments for SSc digital ulcers (DUs) to inform the development of evidence-based treatment guidelines.
methodsA systematic literature review of seven databases was performed to identify all original research studies of adult patients with SSc DUs. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective longitudinal observational studies (OBSs) were eligible for inclusion. Data were extracted, applying the patient, intervention, comparison, outcome framework, and risk of bias (RoB) was assessed. Due to study heterogeneity, narrative summaries were used to present data.
resultsForty-seven studies that evaluated the treatment efficacy or safety of pharmacological therapies were identified among 4250 references. Data from 18 RCTs of 1927 patients and 29 OBSs of 661 patients, at various RoB (total 2588 patients) showed that i.v. iloprost, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and atorvastatin are effective for the treatment of active DUs. Bosentan reduced the rate of future DUs in two RCTs (moderate RoB) and eight OBSs at low to high RoB. Two small studies (moderate RoB) indicate that Janus kinase inhibitors may be effective for the treatment of active DUs, otherwise there are no data to support the use of immunosuppression or anti-platelet agents in the management of DUs.
conclusionThere are several systemic treatments, across four medication classes, that are effective therapies for the management of SSc DUs. However, a lack of robust data means it is not possible to define the optimal treatment regimen for SSc DUs. The relatively low quality of evidence available has highlighted further areas of research need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.