Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37335592›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Conditioning of the Cortisol Awakening Response in Healthy Men: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Fabian Wolters, Henriët van Middendorp, Omer Van den Bergh, Nienke R Biermasz, Onno C Meijer, Andrea Wm Evers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabian WoltersHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9698-9527
Henriët van MiddendorpHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4575-0895
Omer Van den BerghHealth Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6394-7363
Nienke R BiermaszDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5817-3594
Onno C MeijerDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8394-6859
Andrea Wm EversHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0090-5091
Leiden University · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe hormone cortisol plays important roles in human circadian and stress physiology and is an interesting target for interventions. Cortisol varies not only in response to stress but also as part of a diurnal rhythm. It shows a particularly sharp increase immediately after awakening, the cortisol awakening response (CAR). Cortisol can be affected by medication, but it is less clear whether it can also be affected by learning. Animal studies have consistently shown that cortisol can be affected by pharmacological conditioning, but the results in humans have been mixed. Other studies have suggested that conditioning is also possible during sleep and that the diurnal rhythm can be conditioned, but these findings have not yet been applied to cortisol conditioning.

objectiveThe objective of our study was to introduce a novel avenue for conditioning cortisol: by using the CAR as an unconditioned response and using scent conditioning while the participant is asleep. This study investigates an innovative way to study the effects of conditioning on cortisol and the diurnal rhythm, using a variety of devices and measures to make measurement possible at a distance and at unusual moments.

methodsThe study protocol takes 2 weeks and is performed from the participant's home. Measures in week 1 are taken to reflect the CAR and waking under baseline conditions. For the first 3 nights of week 2, participants are exposed to a scent from 30 minutes before awakening until their normal time of awakening to allow the scent to become associated with the CAR. On the final night, participants are forced to wake 4 hours earlier, when cortisol levels are normally low, and either the same (conditioned group) or a different (control group) scent is presented half an hour before this new time. This allows us to test whether cortisol levels are higher after the same scent is presented. The primary outcome is the CAR, assessed by saliva cortisol levels, 0, 15, 30, and 45 minutes after awakening. The secondary outcomes are heart rate variability, actigraphy measures taken during sleep, and self-reported mood after awakening. To perform manipulations and measurements, this study uses wearable devices, 2 smartphone apps, web-based questionnaires, and a programmed scent device.

resultsWe completed data collection as of December 24, 2021.

conclusionsThis study can provide new insights into learning effects on cortisol and the diurnal rhythm. If the procedure does affect the CAR and associated measures, it also has potential clinical implications in the treatment of sleep and stress disorders.

trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register NL58792.058.16; https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL7791. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/38087.

Indexed as

conditioningcortisolcortisol awakening responseolfactory learningsleep

Identifiers

PMID37335592
PMCPMC10337450
OpenAlexW4361988145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.