Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37335471›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

A Bioinformatic Pipeline to Estimate Ploidy Level from Target Capture Sequence Data Obtained from Herbarium Specimens.

Juan Viruel, Oriane Hidalgo, Lisa Pokorny, Félix Forest, Barbara Gravendeel, Paul Wilkin, Ilia J Leitch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Harnessing Genomics for BreedingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juan ViruelRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK. j.viruel@kew.org.
Oriane HidalgoRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
Lisa PokornyRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
Félix ForestRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
Barbara GravendeelNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Evolutionary Ecology, Leiden, Netherlands.
Paul WilkinRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
Ilia J LeitchRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole genome duplications (WGD) are frequent in many plant lineages; however, ploidy level variation is unknown in most species. The most widely used methods to estimate ploidy levels in plants are chromosome counts, which require living specimens, and flow cytometry estimates, which necessitate living or relatively recently collected samples. Newly described bioinformatic methods have been developed to estimate ploidy levels using high-throughput sequencing data, and these have been optimized in plants by calculating allelic ratio values from target capture data. This method relies on the maintenance of allelic ratios from the genome to the sequence data. For example, diploid organisms will generate allelic data in a 1:1 proportion, with an increasing number of possible allelic ratio combinations occurring in individuals with higher ploidy levels. In this chapter, we explain step-by-step this bioinformatic approach for the estimation of ploidy level.

Indexed as

PlantsPloidiesSoftwareChromosomes, PlantDNA, PlantFlow CytometryGenome, PlantPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA, PlantFlow cytometryPhylogenomicsPolyploidySequence captureWhole Genome Duplication

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.