Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37335436›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2024

Perioperative Blood Transfusions and Anastomotic Leak After Colorectal Surgery for Cancer in an Australian Hospital.

Fraser Hugh Simpson, Krish Kulendran, Stephanie Yerkovich, Andrew Beatty, David Flynn, Derek Mao, Taylor Brooks, Phoebe Wood, Manju D Chandrasegaram

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fraser Hugh SimpsonDepartment of General Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. fraser@medico.com.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6123-2321
Krish KulendranDepartment of General Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6737-3205
Stephanie YerkovichSchool of Clinical Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4163-4782
Andrew BeattyDepartment of General Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1806-8383
David FlynnDepartment of General Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2150-3849
Derek MaoDepartment of General Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3979-734X
Taylor BrooksDepartment of General Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5266-9070
Phoebe WoodDepartment of General Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Manju D ChandrasegaramDepartment of General Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4826-5038
Prince Charles Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePeri-operative blood transfusion has been identified as a risk factor for anastomotic leak in recent studies, but little is known about which patients are at risk for blood transfusion. This study aims to assess the relationship between blood transfusion and anastomotic leak and factors predisposing to leak in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Brisbane, Australia, between 2010 and 2019. A total of 522 patients underwent resection of colorectal cancer with primary anastomosis with no covering stoma and the prevalence of anastomotic leak was compared between those who had had perioperative blood transfusion(s) and those who had not.

resultsA total of 19 of 522 patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer had developed an anastomotic leak (3.64%). 11.3% of patients who had had a perioperative blood transfusion developed an anastomotic leak whereas 2.2% of patients who had not had a blood transfusion developed an anastomotic leak (p = 0.0002). Patients undergoing procedure on their right colon had proportionally more blood transfusions and this approached statistical significance (p = 0.06). Patients who received a greater quantity of units of blood transfusion prior to their diagnosis of anastomotic leak were more likely to develop an anastomotic leak (p = 0.001).

conclusionPerioperative blood transfusions are associated with a significantly increased risk of an anastomotic leak following bowel resection with primary anastomosis for colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakBlood TransfusionColorectal NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomosis, SurgicalAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerioperative CareRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnastomotic leakAustraliaBlood transfusionColorectal cancerPrimary anastomosis

Identifiers

PMID37335436
PMCPMC11096243
OpenAlexW4381166814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.