Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37335401›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2023

Improving Collaboration Between Youth Peer Support Workers and Non-peer Colleagues in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services.

Carolijn R M de Beer, Lieke van Domburgh, Robert R J M Vermeiren, Martin de Vreugd, Laura A Nooteboom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Peer support in acute outreach psychiatric crisis interventions: results of a qualitative study].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carolijn R M de BeerLUMC Curium - Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Post Box 15, 2300 AA, Leiden, The Netherlands. c.r.m.de_beer@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7057-6879
Lieke van DomburghDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry & Psychosocial Care, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5149-2557
Robert R J M VermeirenLUMC Curium - Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Post Box 15, 2300 AA, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8673-2207
Martin de VreugdLUMC Curium - Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Post Box 15, 2300 AA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Laura A NooteboomLUMC Curium - Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Post Box 15, 2300 AA, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4063-4863

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The involvement of youth peer workers (YPSWs) in child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) stimulates hope, destigmatization, and more culturally and developmentally appropriate support. Nevertheless, the collaboration between YPSWs and non-peer colleagues remains challenging, as it requires services to embed a new type of expert into practice. To stimulate the involvement of YPSWs in practice, this study reports on 27 semi-structured interviews with YPSWs and non-peer colleagues to provide insight into the barriers and facilitators in the collaboration process. The study took place in the Netherlands. A total of 10 interviews with YPSWs, and 17 interviews with non-peer colleagues in different healthcare occupations in CAMHS were conducted. Overall, the participants perceived relatively more barriers compared to facilitators in the collaboration process. Barriers to operate efficiently with YPSWs in multidisciplinary teams included: condescending attitudes and professional stigma towards YPSWs; concerns for YPSW boundaries; bureaucratic and clinical language usage by non-peer colleagues; conflicts due to different sets of expertise; and, lack of role clarity and guidelines for YPSWs. To improve the partnership between YPSWs and non-peer colleagues, participants described the importance of supervision and monitoring of YPSW activities. Moreover, participants also stressed the need for clear guidelines, and introduction and evaluation sessions to facilitate the collaboration process. While YPSWs seem to be an asset to CAMHS, there are a number of barriers to overcome. To overcome these barriers, organizational commitment, supervision (especially from peer colleagues), flexibility by non-peer colleagues, training non-peer staff to support YPSWs, and consistent evaluation of the implementation of YPSWs in services is recommended.

Indexed as

Adolescent Health ServicesMental Health ServicesAdolescentChildHumansNetherlandsQualitative ResearchChild and adolescent mental health servicesCliniciansCollaborationLived experience workforceYouthYouth peer support workers

Identifiers

PMID37335401
PMCPMC10359199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.