Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37335380›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2023

Clinical and imaging modality factors impacting radiological interpretation of breast screening in young women with neurofibromatosis type 1.

Mathilda Wilding, Jane Fleming, Katrina Moore, Ashley Crook, Ranjani Reddy, Sarah Choi, Timothy E Schlub, Michael Field, Lavvina Thiyagarajan, Jeff Thompson and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mathilda WildingNSLHD Familial Cancer Service, Department of Cancer Services, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. mathilda.wilding@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6054-039X
Jane FlemingDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1164-2386
Katrina MooreDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4382-6702
Ashley CrookNSLHD Familial Cancer Service, Department of Cancer Services, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5578-0460
Ranjani ReddyNorth Shore Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Pacific Highway, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sarah ChoiNorth Shore Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Pacific Highway, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Timothy E SchlubSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7746-9649
Michael FieldNSLHD Familial Cancer Service, Department of Cancer Services, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7455-934X
Lavvina ThiyagarajanDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8415-9371
Jeff ThompsonNorthern Clinical School, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Yemima BermanDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2495-4928
Royal North Shore Hospital · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Young women with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) have a high risk of developing breast cancer and poorer survival following breast cancer diagnosis. International guidelines recommend commencing breast screening between 30 and 35 years; however, the optimal screening modality is unestablished, and previous reports suggest that breast imaging may be complicated by the presence of intramammary and cutaneous neurofibromas (cNFs). The aim of this study was to explore potential barriers to implementation of breast screening for young women with NF1.Twenty-seven women (30-47 years) with NF1 completed breast screening with breast MRI, mammogram and breast ultrasound. Nineteen probably benign/suspicious lesions were detected across 14 women. Despite the presence of breast cNFs, initial biopsy rate for participants with NF1 (37%), were comparable to a BRCA pathogenic variant (PV) cohort (25%) (P = 0.311). No cancers or intramammary neurofibromas were identified. Most participants (89%) returned for second round screening.The presence of cNF did not affect clinician confidence in 3D mammogram interpretation, although increasing breast density, frequently seen in young women, impeded confidence for 2D and 3D mammogram. Moderate or marked background parenchymal enhancement on MRI was higher in the NF1 cohort (70.4%) than BRCA PV carriers (47.3%), which is an independent risk factor for breast cancer.Breast MRI was the preferred mode of screening over mammogram, as the majority (85%) with NF1 demonstrated breast density (BI-RADS 3C/4D), which hinders mammogram interpretation. For those with high breast density and high cNF breast coverage, 3D rather than 2D mammogram is preferred, if MRI is unavailable.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeurofibromatosis 1BreastFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMammographyRetrospective StudiesBI-RADS lesionsBreast cancer screeningBreast densityMammogramMRINeurofibromatosis

Identifiers

PMID37335380
OpenAlexW4381166441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.