Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37335168›Full record

ArticleJournal of food and drug analysis2023

Preparation procedures of food and beverage samples for oxygen bomb calorimetry: A scoping review and reporting checklist.

Zane Hopper, Ben Desbrow, Shelley Roberts, Chris Irwin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food and drug analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07195006 (Early Life Diarrhoea Episode), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07195006 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Early Life Diarrhoea Episode(s), Malnutrition, Environmental Enteric Dysfunction and Microbiome Trajectories From Birth Until 3 Years of Life ; The University of Zimbabwe Birth Cohort Study-2 (UZBCS-2)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of ZimbabweRan2025 to 2032Enrolled368ConditionsMalnutrition Pregnancy, Malnutrition in Children, Malnutrition (Calorie), Environmental Enteric DysfunctionArmsMalnutrition in pregnancy as exposure, Poor WASH living conditions as exposure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zane HopperSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Ben DesbrowSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Shelley RobertsSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Chris IrwinSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standardised bomb calorimetry methods are essential to accurately quantify the gross energy within food and beverages, yet no accepted protocols exist. The objective of this review was to synthesise literature on food and beverage sample preparation methods used for conducting bomb calorimetry. This synthesis enhances our understanding of the extent to which methodological variances may currently affect estimates of the caloric values of dietary items. Five electronic databases were searched for peer reviewed literature on food and beverage energy measurement via bomb calorimetry. Data were extracted on seven identified methodological themes, including: (1) initial homogenisation, (2) sample dehydration, (3) post-dehydration homogenisation, (4) sample presentation, (5) sample weight, (6) sample frequency, and (7) equipment calibration. A tabular and narrative approach was used to synthesise the data. Studies that specifically explored the impact of any methodological variance on the energy derived from foods and/or beverages were also considered. In total, 71 documents describing food and beverage sample preparation techniques and processes used for bomb calorimetry were identified. Only 8% of studies described all seven identified sample preparation and calibration processes. The most frequent approaches used included: initial homogenisation - mixing or blending (n = 21); sample dehydration - freeze drying (n = 37); post-dehydration homogenisation - grinding (n = 24); sample presentation - pelletisation (n = 29); sample weight - 1g (n = 14); sample frequency - duplicate (n = 17); and equipment calibration - benzoic acid (n = 30). The majority of studies that have measured food and beverage energy via bomb calorimetry do not describe sample preparation and calibration methods in detail. The extent to which different sample preparation processes influence the energy derived from food and beverage items is yet to be fully elucidated. Use of a bomb calorimetry reporting checklist (described within) may assist with improving the methodological quality of bomb calorimetry studies.

Indexed as

ChecklistDehydrationBeveragesCalorimetryEnergy IntakeHumans

Identifiers

PMID37335168
PMCPMC10281735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.