Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37334881›Full record

Trial reportCancer medicine2023

Phase I study of cisplatin and nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel combined with concurrent radiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Hui Jiang, Qiaoqiao Li, Baoqing Chen, Mian Xi, Kanjiebubi Makelike, Shiliang Liu, Yonghong Hu, Yujia Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hui JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Qiaoqiao LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Baoqing ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Mian XiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Kanjiebubi MakelikeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Shiliang LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yonghong HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yujia ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8523-0125
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis phase I study aimed to assess the safety, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and preliminary effect of nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

methodsPatients with locally advanced ESCC who were ineligible or refused surgery were enrolled. Nab-paclitaxel (60 mg/m

resultsThe study enrolled 12 patients across three dose levels. No treatment-related deaths occurred. One patient in the 60 mg/m

conclusionsWeekly schedule of cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel in combination with concurrent radiotherapy showed manageable toxicities and promising antitumor activity in patients with locally advanced ESCC. The recommended dose of nab-paclitaxel for further studies is 75 mg/m

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaNanoparticlesAlbuminsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapyCisplatinHumansPaclitaxel130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsCisplatinPaclitaxeldose escalationesophageal squamous cell carcinomananoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxelphase I studyradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37334881
PMCPMC10417080
OpenAlexW4381249436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.