Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37334623›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics2024

Multi-polygenic scores in psychiatry: From disorder specific to transdiagnostic perspectives.

Yingjie Shi, Emma Sprooten, Peter Mulders, Janna Vrijsen, Janita Bralten, Ditte Demontis, Anders D Børglum, G Bragi Walters, Kari Stefansson, Philip van Eijndhoven and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. New insights from the last decade of research in psychiatric genetics: discoveries, challenges and clinical implications.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yingjie ShiDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1431-6340
Emma SprootenDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Peter MuldersDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Janna VrijsenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Janita BraltenDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ditte DemontisDepartment of Biomedicine/Human Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anders D BørglumDepartment of Biomedicine/Human Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
G Bragi WaltersdeCODE Genetics, Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-5415-6487
Kari StefanssondeCODE Genetics, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Philip van EijndhovenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Indira TendolkarDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Barbara FrankeDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nina Roth MotaDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

2/7 Psychiatric Genomics Consortium: Advancing Discovery and ImpactR01MH124851 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BOERGLUM, ANDERS, DAVIS, LEA K · 2021 to 2025
$5.4M
5/7 Psychiatric Genomics Consortium: Finding actionable variationU01MH109514 · NIMH · CARDIFF UNIVERSITY · PI O'DONOVAN, MICHAEL · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124851NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH109514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dense co-occurrence of psychiatric disorders questions the categorical classification tradition and motivates efforts to establish dimensional constructs with neurobiological foundations that transcend diagnostic boundaries. In this study, we examined the genetic liability for eight major psychiatric disorder phenotypes under both a disorder-specific and a transdiagnostic framework. The study sample (n = 513) was deeply phenotyped, consisting of 452 patients from tertiary care with mood disorders, anxiety disorders (ANX), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorders, and/or substance use disorders (SUD) and 61 unaffected comparison individuals. We computed subject-specific polygenic risk score (PRS) profiles and assessed their associations with psychiatric diagnoses, comorbidity status, as well as cross-disorder behavioral dimensions derived from a rich battery of psychopathology assessments. High PRSs for depression were unselectively associated with the diagnosis of SUD, ADHD, ANX, and mood disorders (p < 1e-4). In the dimensional approach, four distinct functional domains were uncovered, namely the negative valence, social, cognitive, and regulatory systems, closely matching the major functional domains proposed by the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework. Critically, the genetic predisposition for depression was selectively reflected in the functional aspect of negative valence systems (R

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityPsychiatrySubstance-Related DisordersAnxiety DisordersHumansMultifactorial InheritancePsychopathologyfactor analysispolygenic risk scorespsychiatric disorderstransdiagnostic approach

Identifiers

PMID37334623
PMCPMC10803201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.