ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023
The Use of Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Spinal Reconstruction: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementation of 3D printing technology for complex spine revision cases that require multilevel anterior spinal support: Over 5-year experience in six cases and costs assessment.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Occipital Vascularized Bone Graft for Reconstruction of a C3-C7 Defect.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Free Vascularized Osseous Fibula Flap for Vertebral Body Defect in a Patient with Tuberculosis Spondylitis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Free Vascularized Fibula Graft as Primary Salvage Procedure for Acute Cervical Osteomyelitis Caused by Epidural Abscess.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Fibular grafts in global reconstructive surgery: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reconstructive surgeons frequently face large structural abnormalities after spine resection. Unlike defects in the mandible or long bone, where a free vascularized fibular graft (FVFG) is a popular alternative for segmental osseous reconstruction, data on the use of an FVFG in the spine are still limited. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively describe and analyze the outcome of spinal reconstruction utilizing FVFG. Methods: The extensive search included the following databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane for relevant studies published up to January 20, 2023, according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Demographic data, flap success, recipient vessels, and flap-related complications were evaluated. Results: We identified 25 eligible studies involving 150 patients, consisting of 82 men and 68 women. Spinal reconstruction utilizing FVFG is mostly reported in the case of spinal neoplasm, followed by spinal infection (osteomyelitis and spinal tuberculosis) and spinal deformities. The cervical spine is the most common vertebral defect reported in the studies. All studies summarized in the present study reported successful spinal reconstruction, while wound infection was the most reported postoperative complication after spinal reconstruction utilizing FVFG. Conclusions: The results of the current study highlight the ability and superiority of using FVFG in spinal reconstruction. Despite being technically challenging, this strategy provides enormous benefits to patients. However, a further additional large-scale study is required to corroborate these findings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.