Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37334317›Full record

ArticleJournal of hydrology2023

Emerging organic contaminants in springs of the highly karstified Dinaric region.

Jasmina Lukač Reberski, Ana Selak, Dan J Lapworth, Louise D Maurice, Josip Terzić, Wayne Civil, Andrej Stroj

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hydrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jasmina Lukač ReberskiCroatian Geological Survey, Milana Sachsa 2, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Ana SelakCroatian Geological Survey, Milana Sachsa 2, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Dan J LapworthBritish Geological Survey, Maclean Building, Wallingford OX10 8BB, UK.
Louise D MauriceBritish Geological Survey, Maclean Building, Wallingford OX10 8BB, UK.
Josip TerzićCroatian Geological Survey, Milana Sachsa 2, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Wayne CivilNLS Starcross Lab, Staplake Mount, Starcross, Exeter EX6 8FD, UK.
Andrej StrojCroatian Geological Survey, Milana Sachsa 2, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Croatian Geological Survey · HRBritish Geological Survey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging organic contaminants (EOCs) have become of increasing interest due to concerns about their impact on humans and the wider environment. Karst aquifers are globally widespread, providing critical water supplies and sustaining rivers and ecosystems, and are particularly susceptible to pollution. However, EOC distributions in karst remain quite poorly understood. This study looks at the occurrence of EOCs in the Croatian karst, which is an example of the "classical" karst, a highly developed type of karst that occurs throughout the Dinaric region of Europe. Samples were collected from 17 karst springs and one karst lake used for water supply in Croatia during two sampling campaigns. From a screen of 740 compounds, a total of 65 compounds were detected. EOC compounds from the pharmaceutical (n = 26) and agrochemical groups (n = 26) were the most frequently detected, while industrials and artificial sweeteners had the highest concentrations (range 8-440 ng/L). The number of detected compounds and the frequency of detection demonstrate the vulnerability of karst to EOC pollution. Concentrations of 5 compounds (acesulfame, sucralose, perfluorobutane sulfonate, emamectin B1b, and triphenyl phosphate) exceeded EU standards and occurred at concentrations that are likely to be harmful to ecosystems. Overall, most detections were at low concentrations (50 % <1 ng/L). This may be due to high dilution within the exceptionally large springs of the Classical karst, or due to relatively few pollution sources within the catchments. Nevertheless, EOC fluxes are considerable (10 to 10

Indexed as

Dinaric karstDrinking water resourcesEmerging organic contaminantsGroundwaterKarst aquifers

Identifiers

PMID37334317
PMCPMC10273240
OpenAlexW4367043028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.