Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37334186›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Bio2023

Acceleration of burn wound healing by micronized amniotic membrane seeded with umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Zixuan Zhou, Jingnan Xun, Chenghao Wu, Chao Ji, Shizhao Ji, Futing Shu, Yuxiang Wang, Hao Chen, Yongjun Zheng, Shichu Xiao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Bio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Effects ofVeterinary world · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zixuan ZhouDepartment of Burn Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.
Jingnan XunDepartment of Burn Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.
Chenghao WuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200065, People's Republic of China.
Chao JiDepartment of Burn Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.
Shizhao JiDepartment of Burn Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.
Futing ShuDepartment of Burn Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.
Yuxiang WangDepartment of Burn Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.
Hao ChenDepartment of Burn Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.
Yongjun ZhengDepartment of Burn Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.
Shichu XiaoDepartment of Burn Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.
Tongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSC) are promising candidates for wound healing. However, the low amplification efficiency of MSC in vitro and their low survival rates after transplantation have limited their medical application. In this study, we fabricated a micronized amniotic membrane (mAM) as a microcarrier to amplify MSC in vitro and used mAM and MSC (mAM-MSC) complexes to repair burn wounds. Results showed that MSC could live and proliferate on mAM in a 3D culture system, exhibiting higher cell activity than in 2D culture. Transcriptome sequencing of MSC showed that the expression of growth factor-related, angiogenesis-related, and wound healing-related genes was significantly upregulated in mAM-MSC compared to traditional 2D-cultured MSC, which was verified via RT-qPCR. Gene ontology (GO) analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) showed significant enrichment of terms related to cell proliferation, angiogenesis, cytokine activity, and wound healing in mAM-MSC. In a burn wound model of C57BL/6J mice, topical application of mAM-MSC significantly accelerated wound healing compared to MSC injection alone and was accompanied by longer survival of MSC and greater neovascularization in the wound.

Indexed as

Amniotic membraneBurn wound healingMicrocarrierUmbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells

Identifiers

PMID37334186
PMCPMC10276167
OpenAlexW4379740457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.