Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37334077›Full record

ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2023

Updates on Enhanced Recovery after Surgery protocols for plastic surgery of the breast and future directions.

Nicholas F Lombana, Ishan M Mehta, Caiwei Zheng, Reuben A Falola, Andrew M Altman, Michel H Saint-Cyr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicholas F LombanaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple, Temple, Texas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6259-0964
Ishan M MehtaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple, Temple, Texas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5384-6091
Caiwei ZhengDepartment of General Surgery, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Reuben A FalolaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple, Temple, Texas.
Andrew M AltmanDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple, Temple, Texas.
Michel H Saint-CyrDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Perioperative pain control is an important component of any plastic surgery practice. Due to the incorporation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols, reported pain level, opioid consumption, and hospital length of stay numbers have decreased significantly. This article provides an up-to-date review of current ERAS protocols in use, reviews individual aspects of ERAS protocols, and discusses future directions for the continual improvement of ERAS protocols and control of postoperative pain. ERAS components: ERAS protocols have proven to be excellent methods of decreasing patient pain, opioid consumption, and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and/or inpatient length of stay. ERAS protocols have three phases: preoperative education and pre-habilitation, intraoperative anesthetic blocks, and a postoperative multimodal analgesia regimen. Intraoperative blocks consist of local anesthetic field blocks and a variety of regional blocks, with lidocaine or lidocaine cocktails. Various studies throughout the surgical literature have demonstrated the efficacy of these aspects and their relevance to the overall goal of decreasing patient pain, both in plastic surgery and other surgical fields. In addition to the individual ERAS phases, ERAS protocols have shown promise in both the inpatient and outpatient sectors of plastic surgery of the breast. Conclusion: ERAS protocols have repeatedly been shown to provide improved patient pain control, decreased hospital or PACU length of stay, decreased opioid use, and cost savings. Although protocols have most commonly been utilized in inpatient plastic surgery procedures of the breast, emerging evidence points towards similar efficacy when used in outpatient procedures. Furthermore, this review demonstrates the efficacy of local anesthetic blocks in controlling patient pain.

Indexed as

Breast reconstructionEnhanced Recovery after SurgeryERASintercostal nerve blocklocal anesthesiamultimodal analgesiapain controlPECS I/II blockregional blocksserratus anterior blocktransversus abdominis plane block

Identifiers

PMID37334077
PMCPMC10269427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.