Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37333965›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2023

The Effect of Different Doses of Ciprofol in Patients with Painless Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Lini Chen, Yongguo Xie, Xueke Du, Weiyong Qin, Lifu Huang, Junmin Dai, Ke Qin, Jianfeng Huang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07294989 (Median Effective Concentration of Ciprofol and Its Correlation With Bispectral Index), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07294989 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Median Effective Concentration of Ciprofol and Its Correlation With Bispectral Index: A Prospective Observational Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorPeking University Shenzhen HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled101ConditionsThyroid DiseaseArmsCiprofol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. The median Effective Dose (EDBMC anesthesiology · 2025
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lini Chen *Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Yongguo Xie *Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Xueke DuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9796-9202
Weiyong QinDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Lifu HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Junmin DaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Ke Qin *Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Jianfeng Huang *Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ciprofol is currently used for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy and anesthesia induction. However, whether it is superior to propofol and its optimal dose remains unknown. Methods: A total of 149 patients, 63 males and 86 females, aged 18-80 years, BMI 18-28 kg/m Results: Compared with group P, the time to fall asleep was significantly shortened, and the incidence of nausea and vomiting and injection pain was significantly lower in groups C2, C3 and C4 ( Conclusion: The appropriate dose of ciprofol for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy is more advantageous than propofol in hemodynamics and respiratory stability, with less injection pain and nausea and vomiting, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Indexed as

PropofolAnesthesia, GeneralEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFemaleHemodynamicsHumansMalePainPropofolciprofolpainless gastrointestinal endoscopypropofol

Identifiers

PMID37333965
PMCPMC10275323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.