Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37333879›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2023

Invasive Candidiasis in Patients with Solid Tumors: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Xueying Bai, Ji Luo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xueying BaiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China.
Ji LuoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China.
China Medical University · CNFirst Hospital of China Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Invasive candidiasis (ICs) is one of the common causes of death in patients with solid tumors. However, studies on the clinical characteristics of ICs with solid tumors are limited. Methods: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyse the clinical characteristics, laboratory results and risk factor prediction of inpatients with ICs and solid tumors. We reviewed the clinical data and candida specimen information of hospitalized patients diagnosed with solid tumors combined with ICs at the First Hospital of China Medical University from January 2016 to December 2020. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the prognostic factors associated with mortality in these patients. Results: A total of 243 ICs patients with solid tumors were included in this study. The average ± SD age was 62.8 ± 11.7 (range: 27-93 years old), of which nearly 41% were ≥ 65 years old (99/243, 40.7%), and most were male (162/243, 66.6%). Most patients had malignant tumors of the digestive system. The most common candida was Conclusion: In this study, based on the clinical data of solid tumor patients with ICs in the past 5 years, the results showed that the length of stay in the ICU, urinary catheter, total parenteral nutrition, stay in the ICU, renal failure and neutrophil count were identified as the main prognostic factors. This study can be used to help clinicians carry out early intervention for high-risk patients.

Indexed as

epidemicinvasive candidiasisprognosissingle centersolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID37333879
PMCPMC10276605
OpenAlexW4380486560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.