Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37333861›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023

Machine learning classification of plant genotypes grown under different light conditions through the integration of multi-scale time-series data.

Nazmus Sakeef, Sabine Scandola, Curtis Kennedy, Christina Lummer, Jiameng Chang, R Glen Uhrig, Guohui Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Digitally Quantifying Growth and Verdancy ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nazmus SakeefDepartment of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Sabine ScandolaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Curtis KennedyDepartment of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Christina LummerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jiameng ChangDepartment of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
R Glen UhrigDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Guohui LinDepartment of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to mitigate the effects of a changing climate, agriculture requires more effective evaluation, selection, and production of crop cultivars in order to accelerate genotype-to-phenotype connections and the selection of beneficial traits. Critically, plant growth and development are highly dependent on sunlight, with light energy providing plants with the energy required to photosynthesize as well as a means to directly intersect with the environment in order to develop. In plant analyses, machine learning and deep learning techniques have a proven ability to learn plant growth patterns, including detection of disease, plant stress, and growth using a variety of image data. To date, however, studies have not assessed machine learning and deep learning algorithms for their ability to differentiate a large cohort of genotypes grown under several growth conditions using time-series data automatically acquired across multiple scales (daily and developmentally). Here, we extensively evaluate a wide range of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for their ability to differentiate 17 well-characterized photoreceptor deficient genotypes differing in their light detection capabilities grown under several different light conditions. Using algorithm performance measurements of precision, recall, F1-Score, and accuracy, we find that Suport Vector Machine (SVM) maintains the greatest classification accuracy, while a combined ConvLSTM2D deep learning model produces the best genotype classification results across the different growth conditions. Our successful integration of time-series growth data across multiple scales, genotypes and growth conditions sets a new foundational baseline from which more complex plant science traits can be assessed for genotype-to-phenotype connections.

Indexed as

Computer visionDeep learningFeature extractionMachine learningPhenotyping

Identifiers

PMID37333861
PMCPMC10275741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.