ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023
Machine learning classification of plant genotypes grown under different light conditions through the integration of multi-scale time-series data.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shaping kale morphology and physiology using precision LED light recipes.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Article
- Effects of Strip Width on Inter-Row Heterogeneity in Light Interception and Utilization of Intercropped Soybeans.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predicting plant stress using SAM-L: novel self-adaptive-meta learner with XAI based on soil moisture and chlorophyll analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Molecular Breeding for Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crops: Recent Developments and Future Prospectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Digitally Quantifying Growth and Verdancy ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cell Wall-Based Machine Learning Models to Predict Plant Growth Using Onion Epidermis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Non-invasive, fast, and high-performance EGFR gene mutation prediction method based on deep transfer learning and model stacking for patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.European journal of radiology open · 2024Article
- Integrated web portal for non-destructive salt sensitivity detection ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to mitigate the effects of a changing climate, agriculture requires more effective evaluation, selection, and production of crop cultivars in order to accelerate genotype-to-phenotype connections and the selection of beneficial traits. Critically, plant growth and development are highly dependent on sunlight, with light energy providing plants with the energy required to photosynthesize as well as a means to directly intersect with the environment in order to develop. In plant analyses, machine learning and deep learning techniques have a proven ability to learn plant growth patterns, including detection of disease, plant stress, and growth using a variety of image data. To date, however, studies have not assessed machine learning and deep learning algorithms for their ability to differentiate a large cohort of genotypes grown under several growth conditions using time-series data automatically acquired across multiple scales (daily and developmentally). Here, we extensively evaluate a wide range of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for their ability to differentiate 17 well-characterized photoreceptor deficient genotypes differing in their light detection capabilities grown under several different light conditions. Using algorithm performance measurements of precision, recall, F1-Score, and accuracy, we find that Suport Vector Machine (SVM) maintains the greatest classification accuracy, while a combined ConvLSTM2D deep learning model produces the best genotype classification results across the different growth conditions. Our successful integration of time-series growth data across multiple scales, genotypes and growth conditions sets a new foundational baseline from which more complex plant science traits can be assessed for genotype-to-phenotype connections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.