ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023
The potential of convolutional neural networks for identifying neural states based on electrophysiological signals: experiments on synthetic and real patient data.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding pre-movement neural activity from thalamic LFPs for adaptive neurostimulation in tremor patients.Neurocomputing · 2026Article
- Prediction of Pathological Subthalamic Nucleus Beta Burst Occurrence in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Based Classification of ICU-Acquired Neuromuscular Weakness: A Comparative Study in Survivors of Critical Illness.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Processing incoming neural oscillatory signals in real-time and decoding from them relevant behavioral or pathological states is often required for adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation (aDBS) and other brain-computer interface (BCI) applications. Most current approaches rely on first extracting a set of predefined features, such as the power in canonical frequency bands or various time-domain features, and then training machine learning systems that use those predefined features as inputs and infer what the underlying brain state is at each given time point. However, whether this algorithmic approach is best suited to extract all available information contained within the neural waveforms remains an open question. Here, we aim to explore different algorithmic approaches in terms of their potential to yield improvements in decoding performance based on neural activity such as measured through local field potentials (LFPs) recordings or electroencephalography (EEG). In particular, we aim to explore the potential of end-to-end convolutional neural networks, and compare this approach with other machine learning methods that are based on extracting predefined feature sets. To this end, we implement and train a number of machine learning models, based either on manually constructed features or, in the case of deep learning-based models, on features directly learnt from the data. We benchmark these models on the task of identifying neural states using simulated data, which incorporates waveform features previously linked to physiological and pathological functions. We then assess the performance of these models in decoding movements based on local field potentials recorded from the motor thalamus of patients with essential tremor. Our findings, derived from both simulated and real patient data, suggest that end-to-end deep learning-based methods may surpass feature-based approaches, particularly when the relevant patterns within the waveform data are either unknown, difficult to quantify, or when there may be, from the point of view of the predefined feature extraction pipeline, unidentified features that could contribute to decoding performance. The methodologies proposed in this study might hold potential for application in adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) and other brain-computer interface systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.