Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37333833›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023

Tele-supervised home-based transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) for Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study.

Davide Cappon, Rachel Fox, Tim den Boer, Wanting Yu, Nicole LaGanke, Gabriele Cattaneo, Ruben Perellón-Alfonso, David Bartrés-Faz, Brad Manor, Alvaro Pascual-Leone

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04783350 (Home-based Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04783350 nacompletednot on this map

Home-based Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) for Older Adults at Risk of Memory Decline

TypeinterventionalSponsorHebrew SeniorLifeRan2020 to 2023Enrolled20ConditionsAlzheimer Disease, Memory LossArmsTranscranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Davide CapponHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research at Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, United States.
Rachel FoxHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research at Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, United States.
Tim den BoerHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research at Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, United States.
Wanting YuHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research at Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, United States.
Nicole LaGankeHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research at Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, United States.
Gabriele CattaneoInstitut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació Adscrit a la UAB, Barcelona, Spain.
Ruben Perellón-AlfonsoDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
David Bartrés-FazDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Brad ManorHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research at Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, United States.
Alvaro Pascual-LeoneHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research at Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, United States.
Hebrew SeniorLife · USConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESHarvard University · USInstitut Guttmann · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Over 55 million people worldwide are currently diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and live with debilitating episodic memory deficits. Current pharmacological treatments have limited efficacy. Recently, transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) has shown memory improvement in AD by normalizing high-frequency neuronal activity. Here we investigate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary effects on episodic memory of an innovative protocol where tACS is administered within the homes of older adults with AD with the help of a study companion (HB-tACS). Methods: Eight participants diagnosed with AD underwent multiple consecutive sessions of high-definition HB-tACS (40 Hz, 20-min) targeting the left angular gyrus (AG), a key node of the memory network. The Acute Phase comprised 14-weeks of HB-tACS with at least five sessions per week. Three participants underwent resting state electroencephalography (EEG) before and after the 14-week Acute Phase. Subsequently, participants completed a 2-3-month Hiatus Phase not receiving HB-tACS. Finally, in the Taper phase, participants received 2-3 sessions per week over 3-months. Primary outcomes were safety, as determined by the reporting of side effects and adverse events, and feasibility, as determined by adherence and compliance with the study protocol. Primary clinical outcomes were memory and global cognition, measured with the Memory Index Score (MIS) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), respectively. Secondary outcome was EEG theta/gamma ratio. Results reported as mean ± SD. Results: All participants completed the study, with an average of 97 HB-tACS sessions completed by each participant; reporting mild side effects during 25% of sessions, moderate during 5%, and severe during 1%. Acute Phase adherence was 98 ± 6.8% and Taper phase was 125 ± 22.3% (rates over 100% indicates participants completed more than the minimum of 2/week). After the Acute Phase, all participants showed memory improvement, MIS of 7.25 ± 3.77, sustained during Hiatus 7.00 ± 4.90 and Taper 4.63 ± 2.39 Phases compared to baseline. For the three participants that underwent EEG, a decreased theta/gamma ratio in AG was observed. Conversely, participants did not show improvement in the MoCA, 1.13 ± 3.80 after the Acute Phase, and there was a modest decrease during the Hiatus -0.64 ± 3.28 and Taper -2.56 ± 5.03 Phases. Conclusion: This pilot study shows that the home-based, remotely-supervised, study companion administered, multi-channel tACS protocol for older adults with AD was feasible and safe. Further, targeting the left AG, memory in this sample was improved. These are preliminary results that warrant larger more definite trials to further elucidate tolerability and efficacy of the HB-tACS intervention. NCT04783350. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04783350?term=NCT04783350&draw=2&rank=1, identifier NCT04783350.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasecognitionelectroencephalography (EEG)memoryneuromodulationtranscranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

Identifiers

PMID37333833
PMCPMC10272342
OpenAlexW4379231939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.