Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37333832›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023

Mood and anxiety disorders within the Research Domain Criteria framework of Positive and Negative Valence Systems: a scoping review.

Sarah Jane Böttger, Bernd R Förstner, Laura Szalek, Kristin Koller-Schlaud, Michael A Rapp, Mira Tschorn

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Social anxiety and the positive valence system: A scoping review.Journal of mood and anxiety disorders · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah Jane BöttgerSocial and Preventive Medicine, Department of Sports and Health Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Bernd R FörstnerSocial and Preventive Medicine, Department of Sports and Health Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Laura SzalekSocial and Preventive Medicine, Department of Sports and Health Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Kristin Koller-SchlaudDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Brandenburg Medical School, University Hospital Ruppin-Brandenburg, Neuruppin, Germany.
Michael A RappSocial and Preventive Medicine, Department of Sports and Health Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Mira TschornSocial and Preventive Medicine, Department of Sports and Health Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
University of Potsdam · DEMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: While a growing body of research is adopting Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)-related methods and constructs, there is still a lack of comprehensive reviews on the state of published research on Positive Valence Systems (PVS) and Negative Valence Systems (NVS) in mood and anxiety disorders consistent with the RDoC framework. Methods: Five electronic databases were searched to identify peer-reviewed publications covering research on "positive valence" and "negative valence" as well as "valence," "affect," and "emotion" for individuals with symptoms of mood and anxiety disorders. Data was extracted with a focus on disorder, domain, (sub-) constructs, units of analysis, key results, and study design. Findings are presented along four sections, distinguishing between primary articles and reviews each for PVS, NVS, and cross-domain PVS and NVS. Results: A total of 231 abstracts were identified, and 43 met the inclusion criteria for this scoping review. Seventeen publications addressed research on PVS, seventeen on NVS, and nine covered cross-domain research on PVS and NVS. Psychological constructs were typically examined across different units of analysis, with the majority of publications incorporating two or more measures. Molecular, genetic, and physiological aspects were mainly investigated via review articles, primary articles focused on self-report, behavioral, and, to a lesser extent, physiological measures. Conclusions: This present scoping review shows that mood and anxiety disorders were actively studied using a range of genetic, molecular, neuronal, physiological, behavioral, and self-report measures within the RDoC PVS and NVS. Results highlight the essential role of specific cortical frontal brain structures and of subcortical limbic structures in impaired emotional processing in mood and anxiety disorders. Findings also indicate overall limited research on NVS in bipolar disorders and PVS in anxiety disorders, a majority of self-report studies, and predominantly observational studies. Future research is needed to develop more RDoC-consistent advancements and intervention studies targeting neuroscience-driven PVS and NVS constructs.

Indexed as

anxiety disordersmood disordersNegative Valence Systems (NVS)Positive Valence Systems (PVS)Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)scoping review

Identifiers

PMID37333832
PMCPMC10272468
OpenAlexW4379232559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.