ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
The efficacy of
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection rate of [Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic efficacy of [BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- [Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Evaluation of Approaches for the Assessment of HER2 Expression in Breast Cancer by Radionuclide Imaging Using the Scaffold Protein [Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Review
- Biodistribution and Semiquantitative Analysis ofIndian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Compared with PET/CT or PET/MRI, SPECT/CT is cheaper and more readily accessible. This study was designed to investigate the efficacy of Methods: A retrospective analysis of 31 patients with pathologically proven PCa was performed at Shanghai General Hospital from November 2020 to November 2021. Planar whole-body imaging was performed on all patients with a SPECT/CT scan of PSMA-positive regions 3-4 h after intravenous injection of 740 MBq Results: The SUVmean and SUVmax of the high-risk stratification subgroups (tPSA>20 ng/ml, GS ≥8, and tPSA >20 ng/ml and GS≥8) were higher than those of the low-moderate risk stratification subgroups, with sensitivities of 92% and 92%, respectively. Neither SPECT/CT parameters (SUVmean, SUVmax) nor clinicopathologic factors (tPSA, GS) had high sensitivity (80%, 90%, 80%, and 90%, respectively, P <0.05) in distant metastatic prediction. For both the guideline tPSA level (20 ng/ml) and the cut-off level (84.3 ng/ml), the difference in the distant metastasis detection rate between the low predicted tPSA group and the high predicted tPSA group was statistically significant (0% Conclusion:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.