Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37333811›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

CNN-based automatic segmentations and radiomics feature reliability on contrast-enhanced ultrasound images for renal tumors.

Yin Yang, Fei Chen, Hongmei Liang, Yun Bai, Zhen Wang, Lei Zhao, Sai Ma, Qinghua Niu, Fan Li, Tianwu Xie and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Automation of Wilms' tumor segmentation by artificial intelligence.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yin YangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Fei ChenDepartment of Pediatrics, Jiahui International Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Hongmei LiangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yun BaiDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhen WangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Taiyuan Normal University, Taiyuan, China.
Lei ZhaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Sai MaDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qinghua NiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Fan LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Tianwu XieInstitute of Radiation Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yingyu CaiDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the feasibility and efficiency of automatic segmentation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images in renal tumors by convolutional neural network (CNN) based models and their further application in radiomic analysis. Materials and methods: From 94 pathologically confirmed renal tumor cases, 3355 CEUS images were extracted and randomly divided into training set (3020 images) and test set (335 images). According to the histological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma, the test set was further split into clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) set (225 images), renal angiomyolipoma (AML) set (77 images) and set of other subtypes (33 images). Manual segmentation was the gold standard and serves as ground truth. Seven CNN-based models including DeepLabV3+, UNet, UNet++, UNet3+, SegNet, MultilResUNet and Attention UNet were used for automatic segmentation. Python 3.7.0 and Pyradiomics package 3.0.1 were used for radiomic feature extraction. Performance of all approaches was evaluated by the metrics of mean intersection over union (mIOU), dice similarity coefficient (DSC), precision, and recall. Reliability and reproducibility of radiomics features were evaluated by the Pearson coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: All seven CNN-based models achieved good performance with the mIOU, DSC, precision and recall ranging between 81.97%-93.04%, 78.67%-92.70%, 93.92%-97.56%, and 85.29%-95.17%, respectively. The average Pearson coefficients ranged from 0.81 to 0.95, and the average ICCs ranged from 0.77 to 0.92. The UNet++ model showed the best performance with the mIOU, DSC, precision and recall of 93.04%, 92.70%, 97.43% and 95.17%, respectively. For ccRCC, AML and other subtypes, the reliability and reproducibility of radiomic analysis derived from automatically segmented CEUS images were excellent, with the average Pearson coefficients of 0.95, 0.96 and 0.96, and the average ICCs for different subtypes were 0.91, 0.93 and 0.94, respectively. Conclusion: This retrospective single-center study showed that the CNN-based models had good performance on automatic segmentation of CEUS images for renal tumors, especially the UNet++ model. The radiomics features extracted from automatically segmented CEUS images were feasible and reliable, and further validation by multi-center research is necessary.

Indexed as

automatic segmentationcontrast-enhanced ultrasounddeep learningrenal tumorsUNet

Identifiers

PMID37333811
PMCPMC10272725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.