ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2023
Techniques Providing Endpoints for Revascularization in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.
Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editor's Choice - Early Improvement in Wound, Ischaemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) Ischaemia Grade Lowers Risk of Major Amputation following Revascularisation for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia.European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2026Trial
- External Scaffold for Venous Graft to Treat Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: Results of the FRAME Vascular Support.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- An Innovative Delivery System of Oxygen-Releasing Nanospheres and Self-Healing Hydrogels Enhances the Therapeutic Effectiveness of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is frequently difficult to estimate the revascularization endpoint in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia where there may be extensive multifocal multiarterial disease. There have been attempts to identify an endpoint for revascularization procedures, but none has become the standard of care. An ideal indicator of an endpoint can objectively quantify tissue perfusion, predict wound healing, and is easily and efficiently used intraprocedurally to assist real-time decision making on whether adequate perfusion has been reached. Candidate techniques to evaluate endpoints post-revascularization are discussed here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.