Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37333708›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2023

Comparison of median and paramedian technique of thoracic epidural anaesthesia in patients undergoing laparotomy under combined general and epidural anaesthesia - A prospective observational study.

Priyanka Mudavath, Indira Gurajala, Prasad R Kaluvala, Padmaja Durga

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Priyanka MudavathDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, ESI Hospital, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Indira GurajalaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, NIMS, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Prasad R KaluvalaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, NIMS, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Padmaja DurgaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, NIMS, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Creative Commons · USEmployees' State Insurance Model Hospital · INNational Institute of Medical Statistics · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Most studies have found that lumbar epidural catheterisation is technically easier with a paramedian than median approach. There is scant literature comparing the two approaches to the epidural space in the mid-thoracic spine. This study aims to compare the median versus paramedian approaches in the location of epidural space in the T7-9 region in patients undergoing laparotomy under combined general and epidural anaesthesia. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted after ethical approval and written informed consent on 70 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. The patients received epidural analgesia either through a median or paramedian approach (Group M, Results: Sixty-seven patients were analysed. Epidural catheter was placed successfully in the first attempt in 40% of patients in Group M and 78.1% in Group P ( Conclusion: Epidural catheter insertion was technically easier in paramedian as compared to the median approach in T7-9 thoracic region with no difference in complications.

Indexed as

Analgesiaepiduralmedian approachparamedian approachthoracic vertebrae

Identifiers

PMID37333708
PMCPMC10269984
OpenAlexW4376106049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.