ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2023
Comparison of insertion characteristics of LMA ProSeal and Ambu AuraGain in adult patients under controlled ventilation: A randomised study.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Infographics of published articles.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Supraglottic devices are preformed or flexible, and the insertion characteristics of the two types may be different. This study aims to compare the insertion characteristics of Ambu AuraGain (AAG), preformed) and LMA ProSeal (PLMA), flexible, requires an introducer tool for placement. Methods: Forty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II patients of either sex between 18 and 60 years with no anticipated airway difficulty were randomly allocated to either group AAG or PLMA (n = 20 each). Pregnant females, known case of chronic respiratory disorders and gastroesophageal reflux were excluded. After induction of anaesthesia and muscle relaxation, appropriately sized AAG or PLMA was inserted. Time for successful insertion (primary outcome), ease of device insertion and gastric drain insertion, first attempt success rate (secondary outcomes) were recorded. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20.0. Quantitative parameters were compared using Student's Results: Time taken for successful insertion of PLMA was 22.94 ± 6.12 s and for AAG was 24.32 ± 4.96 s, ( Conclusion: PLMA is easier to insert as compared to AAG, but the insertion time and first attempt success rate are similar. The preformed curvature in AAG does not provide any added advantage over the non-preformed PLMA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.