Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37333697›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2023

Evaluation of neck-circumference- thyromental- distance ratio as a predictor of difficult intubation: A prospective, observational study.

S Pradeep, Sudeshna Bhar Kundu, C Nivetha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S PradeepDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Calcutta National Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Sudeshna Bhar KunduDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Calcutta National Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
C NivethaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Calcutta National Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Preoperative identification of difficult airway and subsequent planning is of utmost importance for a patient's safety. Previous studies have identified the ratio of the neck circumference (NC) to the thyromental distance (TMD); NC/TMD as a reliable predictor of difficult intubation in obese patients. But there is a lack of studies evaluating the NC/TMD in non-obese patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the NC/TMD as a predictor of difficult intubation in both obese and non-obese patients. Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted after obtaining institutional ethics committee clearance and written and informed consent from each patient. One hundred adult patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia with orotracheal intubation were included in this study. Difficulty in intubation was assessed using the Intubation Difficulty Scale. The NC/TMD was calculated and the predictive accuracy of NC/TMD and other established parameters in obese and non-obese patients were compared. Results: Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender, weight, body mass index, inter-incisor gap, Mallampati classification, NC, TMD, sternomental distance, and NC/TMD had a significant association with difficult intubation. NC/TMD has a higher sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value with better predictability in comparison to other parameters. Conclusion: The NC/TMD is a reliable and better predictor of difficult intubation in both obese and non-obese patients in comparison to NC, TMD, and sternomental distance alone.

Indexed as

airwayGeneral anaesthesiaintubationneck circumferenceNeck-circumference-to-thyromental-distance ratioobesethyromental distance

Identifiers

PMID37333697
PMCPMC10269975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.