Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37333662›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

Three-dimensional convolutional neural network model to identify clinically significant prostate cancer in transrectal ultrasound videos: a prospective, multi-institutional, diagnostic study.

Yi-Kang Sun, Bo-Yang Zhou, Yao Miao, Yi-Lei Shi, Shi-Hao Xu, Dao-Ming Wu, Lei Zhang, Guang Xu, Ting-Fan Wu, Li-Fan Wang and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07760857 (Investigation of an Intelligent Centre-adaptive Multi-modal Fusion Framework), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07760857 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Investigation of an Intelligent Centre-adaptive Multi-modal Fusion Framework (Cad- MMFF) to Overcome Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies and Optimize MRI Utilization: a Hybrid Retrospective-prospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2026 to 2030Enrolled400ConditionsProstate Cancer (Diagnosis)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Yi-Kang SunDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Bo-Yang ZhouDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yao MiaoDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumour, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Institute of Research and Education, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Yi-Lei ShiMedAI Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China.
Shi-Hao XuDepartment of Ultrasonography, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.
Dao-Ming WuDepartment of Ultrasound, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian, China.
Lei ZhangMedAI Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China.
Guang XuDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumour, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Institute of Research and Education, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Ting-Fan WuBayer Healthcare, Radiology, Shanghai, China.
Li-Fan WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hao-Hao YinDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xin YeDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Dan LuDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hong HanDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Li-Hua XiangDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumour, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Institute of Research and Education, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao-Xiang ZhuChair of Data Science in Earth Observation, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Chong-Ke ZhaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hui-Xiong XuDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
China Alliance of Multi-Center Clinical Study for Ultrasound (Ultra-Chance)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Identifying patients with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) before biopsy helps reduce unnecessary biopsies and improve patient prognosis. The diagnostic performance of traditional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) for csPCa is relatively limited. This study was aimed to develop a high-performance convolutional neural network (CNN) model (P-Net) based on a TRUS video of the entire prostate and investigate its efficacy in identifying csPCa. Methods: Between January 2021 and December 2022, this study prospectively evaluated 832 patients from four centres who underwent prostate biopsy and/or radical prostatectomy. All patients had a standardised TRUS video of the whole prostate. A two-dimensional CNN (2D P-Net) and three-dimensional CNN (3D P-Net) were constructed using the training cohort (559 patients) and tested on the internal validation cohort (140 patients) as well as on the external validation cohort (133 patients). The performance of 2D P-Net and 3D P-Net in predicting csPCa was assessed in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), biopsy rate, and unnecessary biopsy rate, and compared with the TRUS 5-point Likert score system as well as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) v2.1. Decision curve analyses (DCAs) were used to determine the net benefits associated with their use. The study is registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn with the unique identifier ChiCTR2200064545. Findings: The diagnostic performance of 3D P-Net (AUC: 0.85-0.89) was superior to TRUS 5-point Likert score system (AUC: 0.71-0.78, Interpretation: 3D P-Net based on a prostate grayscale TRUS video achieved satisfactory performance in identifying csPCa and potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies. More studies to determine how AI models better integrate into routine practice and randomized controlled trials to show the values of these models in real clinical applications are warranted. Funding: The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 82202174 and 82202153), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grants 18441905500 and 19DZ2251100), Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (Grants 2019LJ21 and SHSLCZDZK03502), Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan (21Y11911200), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (ZD-11-202151), Scientific Research and Development Fund of Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University (Grant 2022ZSQD07).

Indexed as

Clinically significant prostate cancerThree-dimensional convolutional neural networkTwo-dimensional convolutional neural networkUltrasound video

Identifiers

PMID37333662
PMCPMC10276260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.