ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023
Three-dimensional convolutional neural network model to identify clinically significant prostate cancer in transrectal ultrasound videos: a prospective, multi-institutional, diagnostic study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07760857 (Investigation of an Intelligent Centre-adaptive Multi-modal Fusion Framework), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Investigation of an Intelligent Centre-adaptive Multi-modal Fusion Framework (Cad- MMFF) to Overcome Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies and Optimize MRI Utilization: a Hybrid Retrospective-prospective Study
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Residents and Consultants Have Equal Outcomes When Performing Transrectal Fusion Biopsies: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Trial
- Navigating Uncertainty in MRI Diagnosis: A Human-AI Collaborative Strategy for Stratifying Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparing artificial intelligence and healthcare professional performance in surgical and interventional video analysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for prostate cancer detection and risk stratification using transrectal ultrasound: a narrative review.Gland surgery · 2026Review
- Application and prospect of artificial intelligence in diagnostic imaging of prostate cancer.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer: from multimodal imaging to liquid biopsy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Next-Generation Advances in Prostate Cancer Imaging and Artificial Intelligence Applications.Journal of imaging · 2025Review
- Ultrasound-based radiogenomics: status, applications, and future direction.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- Prostate cancer classification using 3D deep learning and ultrasound video clips: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Current paradigm and futuristic vision on new-onset diabetes and pancreatic cancer research.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Deep learning-assisted diagnosis of benign and malignant parotid tumors based on ultrasound: a retrospective study.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Adding the third dimension: 3D convolutional neural network diagnosis of temporal lobe epilepsy.Brain communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Identifying patients with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) before biopsy helps reduce unnecessary biopsies and improve patient prognosis. The diagnostic performance of traditional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) for csPCa is relatively limited. This study was aimed to develop a high-performance convolutional neural network (CNN) model (P-Net) based on a TRUS video of the entire prostate and investigate its efficacy in identifying csPCa. Methods: Between January 2021 and December 2022, this study prospectively evaluated 832 patients from four centres who underwent prostate biopsy and/or radical prostatectomy. All patients had a standardised TRUS video of the whole prostate. A two-dimensional CNN (2D P-Net) and three-dimensional CNN (3D P-Net) were constructed using the training cohort (559 patients) and tested on the internal validation cohort (140 patients) as well as on the external validation cohort (133 patients). The performance of 2D P-Net and 3D P-Net in predicting csPCa was assessed in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), biopsy rate, and unnecessary biopsy rate, and compared with the TRUS 5-point Likert score system as well as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) v2.1. Decision curve analyses (DCAs) were used to determine the net benefits associated with their use. The study is registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn with the unique identifier ChiCTR2200064545. Findings: The diagnostic performance of 3D P-Net (AUC: 0.85-0.89) was superior to TRUS 5-point Likert score system (AUC: 0.71-0.78, Interpretation: 3D P-Net based on a prostate grayscale TRUS video achieved satisfactory performance in identifying csPCa and potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies. More studies to determine how AI models better integrate into routine practice and randomized controlled trials to show the values of these models in real clinical applications are warranted. Funding: The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 82202174 and 82202153), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grants 18441905500 and 19DZ2251100), Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (Grants 2019LJ21 and SHSLCZDZK03502), Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan (21Y11911200), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (ZD-11-202151), Scientific Research and Development Fund of Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University (Grant 2022ZSQD07).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.