Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37333560›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Keeping kids in school: modelling school-based testing and quarantine strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia.

Romesh G Abeysuriya, Rachel Sacks-Davis, Katherine Heath, Dominic Delport, Fiona M Russell, Margie Danchin, Margaret Hellard, Jodie McVernon, Nick Scott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Romesh G AbeysuriyaDisease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Rachel Sacks-DavisDisease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Katherine HeathDisease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Dominic DelportDisease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Fiona M RussellMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Margie DanchinMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Margaret HellardDisease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jodie McVernonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Nick ScottDisease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Burnet Institute · AURoyal Children's Hospital · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In 2021, the Australian Government Department of Health commissioned a consortium of modelling groups to generate evidence assisting the transition from a goal of no community COVID-19 transmission to 'living with COVID-19', with adverse health and social consequences limited by vaccination and other measures. Due to the extended school closures over 2020-21, maximizing face-to-face teaching was a major objective during this transition. The consortium was tasked with informing school surveillance and contact management strategies to minimize infections and support this goal. Methods: Outcomes considered were infections and days of face-to-face teaching lost in the 45 days following an outbreak within an otherwise COVID-naïve school setting. A stochastic agent-based model of COVID-19 transmission was used to evaluate a 'test-to-stay' strategy using daily rapid antigen tests (RATs) for close contacts of a case for 7 days compared with home quarantine; and an asymptomatic surveillance strategy involving twice-weekly screening of all students and/or teachers using RATs. Findings: Test-to-stay had similar effectiveness for reducing school infections as extended home quarantine, without the associated days of face-to-face teaching lost. Asymptomatic screening was beneficial in reducing both infections and days of face-to-face teaching lost and was most beneficial when community prevalence was high. Interpretation: Use of RATs in school settings for surveillance and contact management can help to maximize face-to-face teaching and minimize outbreaks. This evidence supported the implementation of surveillance testing in schools in several Australian jurisdictions from January 2022.

Indexed as

COVID-19AustraliaHumansPandemicsQuarantineSARS-CoV-2agent-based modelCOVID-19outbreakquarantinerapid antigen testschoolsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID37333560
PMCPMC10272722
OpenAlexW4379231974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.