Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37333467›Full record

ArticleNew directions for evaluation2022

Implementing case study design to evaluate diverse institutions and STEM education contexts: Lessons and key areas for systematic study.

Krystle P Cobian, Damani Khary White-Lewis, Sylvia Hurtado, Hector V Ramos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New directions for evaluation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Krystle P CobianUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Damani Khary White-LewisUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sylvia HurtadoUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Hector V RamosUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

NIH Diversity Program Consortium Coordination and Evaluation Center at UCLAU54GM119024 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI NORRIS, KEITH C, SEEMAN, TERESA E · 2015 to 2023
$38.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM119024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This chapter highlights the important contributions of case study research to the evaluation of student-centered programs and broader STEM initiatives in higher education. We summarize the Diversity Program Consortium's case study evaluation of the Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) initiative, funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), with aims to enhance diversity in the NIH-funded workforce. We describe lessons learned from the case study design used for the evaluation of BUILD that applies to administrators of STEM initiatives who are interested in case study methods and to evaluators who are familiar with case studies and tasked with program evaluation of a multisite STEM program. These lessons include practical considerations for logistics and the importance of clarifying the goals of the case study design within the larger program evaluation, fostering the continuation of knowledge within the evaluation team, and embedding trust building and collaboration throughout all stages of the case study.

Identifiers

PMID37333467
PMCPMC10275575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.