Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37333436›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbes2023

Show us the data: global COVID-19 wastewater monitoring efforts, equity, and gaps.

Colleen C Naughton, Fernando A Roman, Ana Grace F Alvarado, Arianna Q Tariqi, Matthew A Deeming, Krystin F Kadonsky, Kyle Bibby, Aaron Bivins, Gertjan Medema, Warish Ahmed and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Colleen C NaughtonDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA 95343, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3923-7465
Fernando A RomanDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA 95343, United States.
Ana Grace F AlvaradoDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA 95343, United States.
Arianna Q TariqiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA 95343, United States.
Matthew A DeemingDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA 95343, United States.
Krystin F KadonskyDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA 95343, United States.
Kyle BibbyDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Science, University of Notre Dame, 156 Fitzpatrick Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3142-6090
Aaron BivinsDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Science, University of Notre Dame, 156 Fitzpatrick Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556, United States.
Gertjan MedemaKWR Water Research Institute, Groningenhaven 7, 3433 PE Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Warish AhmedCSIRO Land and Water, Ecosciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Road, QLD 4102, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1351-8963
Panagis KatsivelisVenthic Technologies, Kipoupoleos 129, Peristeri, Athens 12137, Greece.
Vajra AllanPATH 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, United States.
Ryan SinclairSchools of Public Health and Earth and Biological Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4360-2071
Joan B RoseDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A year since the declaration of the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there were over 110 million cases and 2.5 million deaths. Learning from methods to track community spread of other viruses such as poliovirus, environmental virologists and those in the wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) field quickly adapted their existing methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater. Unlike COVID-19 case and mortality data, there was not a global dashboard to track wastewater monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 RNA worldwide. This study provides a 1-year review of the "COVIDPoops19" global dashboard of universities, sites, and countries monitoring SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater. Methods to assemble the dashboard combined standard literature review, Google Form submissions, and daily, social media keyword searches. Over 200 universities, 1400 sites, and 55 countries with 59 dashboards monitored wastewater for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. However, monitoring was primarily in high-income countries (65%) with less access to this valuable tool in low- and middle-income countries (35%). Data were not widely shared publicly or accessible to researchers to further inform public health actions, perform meta-analysis, better coordinate, and determine equitable distribution of monitoring sites. For WBE to be used to its full potential during COVID-19 and beyond, show us the data.

Indexed as

COVIDPoops19 dashboardGeographic Information Systems (GIS)open datapublic healthSARS-CoV-2wastewater-based epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID37333436
PMCPMC10117741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.