ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Differential usage of DNA modifications in neurons, astrocytes, and microglia.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Cellular identity is determined partly by cell type-specific epigenomic profiles that regulate gene expression. In neuroscience, there is a pressing need to isolate and characterize the epigenomes of specific CNS cell types in health and disease. This is especially true as for DNA modifications where most data are derived from bisulfite sequencing that cannot differentiate between DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation. In this study, we developed an Results: After validating the cell-specificity of the Camk2a-NuTRAP model, we performed TRAP-RNA-Seq and INTACT whole genome oxidative bisulfite sequencing to assess the neuronal translatome and epigenome in the hippocampus of young mice (3 months old). These data were then compared to microglial and astrocytic data from NuTRAP models. When comparing the different cell types, microglia had the highest global mCG levels followed by astrocytes and then neurons, with the opposite pattern observed for hmCG and mCH. Differentially modified regions between cell types were predominantly found within gene bodies and distal intergenic regions, with limited differences occurring within proximal promoters. Across cell types there was a negative correlation between DNA modifications (mCG, mCH, hmCG) and gene expression at proximal promoters. In contrast, a negative correlation of mCG with gene expression within the gene body while a positive relationship between distal promoter and gene body hmCG and gene expression was observed. Furthermore, we identified a neuron-specific inverse relationship between mCH and gene expression across promoter and gene body regions. Conclusions: In this study, we identified differential usage of DNA modifications across CNS cell types, and assessed the relationship between DNA modifications and gene expression in neurons and glia. Despite having different global levels, the general modification-gene expression relationship was conserved across cell types. The enrichment of differential modifications in gene bodies and distal regulatory elements, but not proximal promoters, across cell types highlights epigenomic patterning in these regions as potentially greater determinants of cell identity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.