Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37333222›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Proactive Versus Reactive Control Strategies Differentially Mediate Alcohol Drinking in Wistar and P rats.

M D Morningstar, N M Timme, B Ma, E Cornwell, T Galbari, C C Lapish

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M D MorningstarIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. Department of Psychology. Indianapolis, IN, 46202. United States of America.
N M TimmeIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. Department of Psychology. Indianapolis, IN, 46202. United States of America.
B MaIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. Department of Psychology. Indianapolis, IN, 46202. United States of America.
E CornwellIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. Department of Psychology. Indianapolis, IN, 46202. United States of America.
T GalbariIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. Department of Psychology. Indianapolis, IN, 46202. United States of America.
C C LapishIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. Department of Psychology. Indianapolis, IN, 46202. United States of America.
University of Indianapolis · US

Funding

Translational Research and Science Education (OUT)P60AA007611 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI Nicholas Joseph Grahame · 2003 to 2026
$45.5M
TRAINING GRANT ON GENETICS ASPECTS OF ALCOHOLISMT32AA007462 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CRISTINE L CZACHOWSKI · 1985 to 2026
$10.7M
Targeting computation in prefrontal cortex to improve decision-making and reduce compulsive drinking in rodent models.R01AA029409 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CZACHOWSKI, CRISTINE L, LAPISH, CHRISTOPHER COURT · 2021 to 2025
$2.2M
NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA007611NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA029409NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Problematic alcohol consumption is associated with deficits in decision-making, and alterations in prefrontal cortex neural activity likely contributes. We hypothesized that differences in cognitive control would be evident between male Wistar rats and a model for genetic risk for alcohol use disorder (alcohol-preferring P rats). Cognitive control can be split into proactive and reactive components. Proactive control maintains goal-directed behavior independent of a stimulus whereas reactive control elicits goal-directed behavior at the time of a stimulus. We hypothesized that Wistars would show proactive control over alcohol-seeking whereas P rats would show reactive control over alcohol-seeking. Neural ensembles were recorded from prefrontal cortex during an alcohol seeking task that utilized two session types. On congruent sessions the CS+ was on the same side as alcohol access. Incongruent sessions presented alcohol opposite the CS+. Wistars, but not P rats, exhibited an increase in incorrect approaches during incongruent sessions, suggesting that Wistars utilized the previously learned task-rule. This motivated the hypothesis that ensemble activity reflecting proactive control would be observable in Wistars but not P rats. While P rats showed differences in neural activity at times relevant for alcohol delivery, Wistars showed differences prior to approaching the sipper. These results support our hypothesis that Wistars are more likely to engage proactive cognitive-control strategies whereas P rats are more likely to engage reactive cognitive control strategies. Although P rats were bred to prefer alcohol, differences in cognitive control may reflect a sequela of behaviors that mirror those in humans at risk for an AUD.

Identifiers

PMID37333222
PMCPMC10274887
OpenAlexW4380153790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.