In one paragraphArticle in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
24 authors.
Muhammad AliWashington University in St. Louis.
Lihua WangWashington University School of Medicine.
Priyanka GorijalaWashington University, School of Medicine.
Jigyasha TimsinaWashington University, School of Medicine.
Corinne EngelmanUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.
Merce BoadaResearch Center and Memory Clinic of Fundació ACE, Institut Català de Neurociències Aplicades-UIC, Barcelona.ORCID 0000-0003-2617-3009 Amanda CanoResearch Center and Memory Clinic, ACE Alzheimer Center Barcelona. Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Spain.
Neill Graff-RadfordMayo Clinic.
Hiroshi MoriDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Faculty of medicine.
Jae-Hong LeeUniversity of Ulsan.
Yun Ju SungWashington University in St. Louis.
Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN)
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)
Funding
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0MVascular Structure and Function in Cognitive AgingP01AG003949 · NIA · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI Richard B. LIPTON · 1985 to 2026
$73.9MSmartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN MORRIS · 1985 to 2026
$69.5MProject 4 - Mechanistic studies on the role of the gut microbiome in models for Alzheimer's diseaseU19AG063744 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI ROB KNIGHT, Rima F Kaddurah-Daouk · 2019 to 2026
$54.1MImaging CoreU19AG032438 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BATEMAN, RANDALL J · 2010 to 2025
$53.9MSUPPLEMENT TO ALZHEIMERS DISEASE PATIENT REGISTRYU01AG006786 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GRAFF-RADFORD, JONATHAN, JACK, CLIFFORD R. · 1986 to 2023
$49.6MThe natural history of AB accumulation in preclinical ADP01AG026276 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, JOHN · 2005 to 2025
$49.5MSUPPLEMENT TO RUSH ALZHEIMERS DISEASE CENTER COREP30AG010161 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BENNETT, DAVID ALAN · 1991 to 2020
$49.1MEPIDEMIOLOGY OF NEURAL RESERVE AND NEUROBIOLOGY IN AGINGR01AG017917 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BENNETT, DAVID ALAN · 2001 to 2023
$43.3MTHE PGRN/TDP-43 AXIS IN ALZHEIMER?S DISEASE AND NEURODEGENERATIONP50AG016574 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETERSEN, RONALD C · 1999 to 2018
$36.9MResearch Education ComponentP30AG066444 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Susan Lynn Stark · 2020 to 2026
$28.7MRush Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG072975 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lisa L Barnes, Julie A. Schneider · 2021 to 2026
$24.7MNIA NIH HHS P01 AG003949NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P01 AG017216NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026276NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010161NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066444NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072975NIA NIH HHS P50 AG016574NIA NIH HHS P50 AG025711NIA NIH HHS R01 AG015819NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017917NIA NIH HHS R01 AG018023NIA NIH HHS R01 AG032990NIA NIH HHS R01 AG044546NIA NIH HHS R01 AG046171NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054047NIA NIH HHS R01 AG069901NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG051550NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG053303NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG058501NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG058942NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG059093NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG074007NIA NIH HHS U01 AG006786NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIA NIH HHS U01 AG046139NIA NIH HHS U01 AG046152NIA NIH HHS U01 AG058922NIA NIH HHS U01 AG061356NIA NIH HHS U01 AG061357NIA NIH HHS U01 AG061359NIA NIH HHS U19 AG032438NIA NIH HHS U19 AG063744NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS080820
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Brain metabolism perturbation can contribute to traits and diseases. We conducted the first large-scale CSF and brain genome-wide association studies, which identified 219 independent associations (59.8% novel) for 144 CSF metabolites and 36 independent associations (55.6% novel) for 34 brain metabolites. Most of the novel signals (97.7% and 70.0% in CSF and brain) were tissue specific. We also integrated MWAS-FUSION approaches with Mendelian Randomization and colocalization to identify causal metabolites for 27 brain and human wellness phenotypes and identified eight metabolites to be causal for eight traits (11 relationships). Low mannose level was causal to bipolar disorder and as dietary supplement it may provide therapeutic benefits. Low galactosylglycerol level was found causal to Parkinson's Disease (PD). Our study expanded the knowledge of MQTL in central nervous system, provided insights into human wellness, and successfully demonstrates the utility of combined statistical approaches to inform interventions.
Identifiers
PMID37333177
PMCPMC10274943
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390