Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37333110›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Temporally specific gene expression and chromatin remodeling programs regulate a conserved

Robert A Phillips, Ethan Wan, Jennifer J Tuscher, David Reid, Olivia R Drake, Lara Ianov, Jeremy J Day

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert A PhillipsDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Ethan WanDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Jennifer J TuscherDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
David ReidDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Olivia R DrakeDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Lara IanovDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Jeremy J DayDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USCivitan International · US

Funding

UAB Research Training Program in Neurobiology of Cognition and Cognitive DisordersT32NS061788 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Farah Dominique Lubin · 2008 to 2026
$4.5M
Role of Gadd45b in Cocaine-driven Epigenetic and Behavioral DynamicsR01DA054714 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI JEREMY J DAY · 2022 to 2026
$3.2M
Reelin Signaling and Function in Cocaine ResponseR01DA053743 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DAY, JEREMY J · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
Epigenetic Control of Brain Reward SystemsDP1DA039650 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DAY, JEREMY J · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
Enhancer RNA Regulation of Experience-dependent Neuroepigenetic ProcessesR01MH114990 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DAY, JEREMY J · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
NIDA NIH HHS DP1 DA039650NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA053743NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA054714NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114990NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS061788
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal and behavioral adaptations to novel stimuli are regulated by temporally dynamic waves of transcriptional activity, which shape neuronal function and guide enduring plasticity. Neuronal activation promotes expression of an immediate early gene (IEG) program comprised primarily of activity-dependent transcription factors, which are thought to regulate a second set of late response genes (LRGs). However, while the mechanisms governing IEG activation have been well studied, the molecular interplay between IEGs and LRGs remain poorly characterized. Here, we used transcriptomic and chromatin accessibility profiling to define activity-driven responses in rat striatal neurons. As expected, neuronal depolarization generated robust changes in gene expression, with early changes (1 h) enriched for inducible transcription factors and later changes (4 h) enriched for neuropeptides, synaptic proteins, and ion channels. Remarkably, while depolarization did not induce chromatin remodeling after 1 h, we found broad increases in chromatin accessibility at thousands of sites in the genome at 4 h after neuronal stimulation. These putative regulatory elements were found almost exclusively at non-coding regions of the genome, and harbored consensus motifs for numerous activity-dependent transcription factors such as AP-1. Furthermore, blocking protein synthesis prevented activity-dependent chromatin remodeling, suggesting that IEG proteins are required for this process. Targeted analysis of LRG loci identified a putative enhancer upstream of

Identifiers

PMID37333110
PMCPMC10274686
OpenAlexW4379515560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.