ArticleFrontiers in digital health2023
Leveraging machine learning to examine engagement with a digital therapeutic.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-time cognitive performance metrics derived from a digital therapeutic for inattention predict ADHD-related clinical outcomes: Replication across three independent trials of AKL-T01.Translational psychiatry · 2024Trial
- Personalized Game-Based Content and Performance: A Pilot Study on a Digital Intervention for Children with ADHD.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital Therapeutics (DTx) are evidence-based software-driven interventions for the prevention, management, and treatment of medical disorders or diseases. DTx offer the unique ability to capture rich objective data about when and how a patient engages with a treatment. Not only can one measure the quantity of patient interactions with a digital treatment with high temporal precision, but one can also assess the quality of these interactions. This is particularly useful for treatments such as cognitive interventions, where the specific manner in which a patient engages may impact likelihood of treatment success. Here, we present a technique for measuring the quality of user interactions with a digital treatment in near-real time. This approach produces evaluations at the level of a roughly four-minute gameplay session (mission). Each mission required users to engage in adaptive and personalized multitasking training. The training included simultaneous presentation of a sensory-motor navigation task and a perceptual discrimination task. We trained a machine learning model to classify user interactions with the digital treatment to determine if they were "using it as intended" or "not using it as intended" based on labeled data created by subject matter experts (SME). On a held-out test set, the classifier was able to reliably predict the SME-derived labels (Accuracy = .94; F1 Score = .94). We discuss the value of this approach and highlight exciting future directions for shared decision-making and communication between caregivers, patients and healthcare providers. Additionally, the output of this technique can be useful for clinical trials and personalized intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.