ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2023
Brief Report: A Multidisciplinary Initial Workup for Suspected Lung Cancer as Fast-Track Intervention to Histopathologic Diagnosis.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing Lung Cancer Diagnostics: Insights from a Fast-Track Program in a Complex Healthcare Setting.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Guidelines for optimal timing of lung cancer diagnosis and treatment have been implemented in many countries, but the effect of fast-track interventions on the shortening of time interval is still debatable. In this study, the delay from the first specialist visit to the histopathologic diagnosis was compared between two patient cohorts: before (n = 280) and after (n = 247) implementation of a fast-track multidisciplinary diagnosis program. The cumulative incidence function curves were compared, and hazard ratio was adjusted in the Cox model. The implementation allowed a statistically significant increase in the cumulative incidence of the lung cancer histopathologic diagnosis over time. Adjusted hazard ratio for patients accrued in the post-implementation cohort was 1.22 (1.03-1.45) (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.