ArticleHeliyon2023
Evolution of teaching in short-term courses: A systematic review.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Towards an accessible, centralised, searchable database for AI courses in Europe: the Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology Education (AIMIROE) project.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Learning Preferences and Characteristics of Generation Z Students in Pediatric Nursing, Midwifery, Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, Radiology Assistance, and Paramedicine: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Neonatal endotracheal intubation: development of a comprehensive educational program for procedural skills.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Empowering professionals: An intensive short course on fundamentals of clinical data science.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- College students' satisfaction with online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Hubei Province, China.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short-term courses are a useful tool for continuous training to update and deepen knowledge in various fields. In this article, we analyse the evolution of the teaching methods used in short-term courses through a systematic review conducted using the PRISMA methodology. The inclusion criteria for selecting articles were those that described the methodological structure of the teaching methods used in designing short-term courses. The exclusion criteria were courses longer than 90 days and unfinished documents. The search was conducted on April 9, 2022, using the SCOPUS database. The list of papers was reviewed and analysed three times by different researchers to ensure that they met the criteria. Articles approved by at least two researchers were selected. The results were systematically analysed based on criteria that allowed us to understand the learning methods used, such as the educational modality, content presentation, teaching methodology for teamwork and individual work, technological resources, and assessment methods. We selected 42 articles, and the results are presented in four parts: the learning experience, teaching methodology, technological resources, and assessment methods. One of the main findings is that short-term courses are primarily designed for experiential learning, and memory-related activities commonly used in traditional training are not typically included in short-term courses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.