Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37332952›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Evolution of teaching in short-term courses: A systematic review.

Andrés F Mena-Guacas, María F Chacón, Aura Patricia Munar, Marizol Ospina, Maryuri Agudelo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrés F Mena-GuacasUniversidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Colombia.
María F ChacónCorporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios, Colombia.
Aura Patricia MunarCorporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios, Colombia.
Marizol OspinaCorporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios, Colombia.
Maryuri AgudeloCorporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short-term courses are a useful tool for continuous training to update and deepen knowledge in various fields. In this article, we analyse the evolution of the teaching methods used in short-term courses through a systematic review conducted using the PRISMA methodology. The inclusion criteria for selecting articles were those that described the methodological structure of the teaching methods used in designing short-term courses. The exclusion criteria were courses longer than 90 days and unfinished documents. The search was conducted on April 9, 2022, using the SCOPUS database. The list of papers was reviewed and analysed three times by different researchers to ensure that they met the criteria. Articles approved by at least two researchers were selected. The results were systematically analysed based on criteria that allowed us to understand the learning methods used, such as the educational modality, content presentation, teaching methodology for teamwork and individual work, technological resources, and assessment methods. We selected 42 articles, and the results are presented in four parts: the learning experience, teaching methodology, technological resources, and assessment methods. One of the main findings is that short-term courses are primarily designed for experiential learning, and memory-related activities commonly used in traditional training are not typically included in short-term courses.

Indexed as

InnovationMicro-credentialsShort-term coursesTeachingTechnology

Identifiers

PMID37332952
PMCPMC10275963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.