ReviewOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2023
One Health at gunpoint: Impact of wild boars as exotic species in Brazil - A review.
Review in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pyogranulomatous pneumonia associated with Actinomyces hyovaginalis infection in a free-ranging Brazilian wild boar.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance and detection of resistance genes of Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. isolated from captive European wild boars reared in Brazil.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Lessons from an eradication under multiple constraints of an island rat population of record density.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
- Coxiella burnetii in free-living feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in Brazil.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2026Article
- The ecological threat posed by invasive species as silent carriers of global priority bacteria to wildlife.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Encephalomyocarditis Virus in Non-Domesticated Species.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Experimental infection of wild boars (Sus scrofa) with Rickettsia rickettsii and evaluation of the transmission potential to Amblyomma sculptum ticks.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Vampire Bats and Wild Boars in Northern Paraná: One Health Perspectives on a Novel Report.Scientifica · 2025Article
- Serological Detection of Ovine Gammaherpesvirus 2 Antibodies in Dairy Farms from Southern Brazil.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Serological and Molecular Survey of Rickettsial Agents in Wild Boars (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Subclinical Ovine Gammaherpesvirus 2-Related Infections in Free-Ranging Wild Boars (Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Torque teno sus virus k2a (TTSuVk2a) in wild boars from northeastern Patagonia, Argentina.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024Article
- Detection of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in native wildlife species at conservation risk of Argentina.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wild boars have been listed among the 100 most invasive species worldwide, spreading impacts to all continents, with the exception of Antarctica. In Brazil, a major source of introduction was a commercial livestock importation for exotic meat market, followed by successive escapes and releases to natural ecosystems. Currently found in all six Brazilian biomes, with reports in 11 Brazilian states, wild boars have invaded natural and agricultural areas. Wild boars have been reportedly indicated as hosts and reservoirs of several zoonotic diseases in Brazil, including toxoplasmosis, salmonelosis, leptospirosis, brucellosis, tuberculosis, trichinellosis, and hepatitis E. Wild boars have been also associated with Brazilian spotted fever and rabies, infected while providing plentiful exotic blood supply for native ticks and hematophagous bats. Due to their phylogenetic proximity, wild boars may present ecological niche overlapping and direct disease risk to native white-lipped and collared peccaries. Moreover, wild boars may post an economical threat to Brazilian livestock industry due to restrictive diseases such as Aujeszky, enzootic pneumonia, neosporosis, hemoplasmosis, and classic swine fever. Finally, wild boars have directly impacted in environmentally protected areas, silting up water springs, rooting and wallowing native plants, decreasing native vegetal coverage, disbalancing of soil components, altering soil structure and composition. Wild boar hunting has failed as a control measure to date, according to the Brazilian Ministry of Environment, due to private hunting groups mostly targeting males, intentionally leaving females and piglets alive, disseminating wild boar populations nationwide. Meanwhile, non-government animal welfare organizations have pointed to animal cruelty of hunting dogs and wild boars (and native species) during hunting. Despite unanimous necessity of wild boar control, eradication and prevention, methods have been controversial and should focus on effective governmental measures instead occasional game hunting, which has negatively impacted native wildlife species while wild boars have continuously spread throughout Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.