ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023
Deep-learning segmentation of fascicles from microCT of the human vagus nerve.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accelerating the development of bioelectronic medicine: outcomes and innovations from the NIH SPARC initiative.Bioelectronic medicine · 2026Review
- Computational Morphometry of Peripheral Nerves: A Pipeline Perspective on Reproducibility and Generalization.Neuroinformatics · 2026Review
- Computational modeling of human vagus nerve stimulation with three-dimensional fascicular morphology.APL bioengineering · 2026Article
- Device and Procedure for Closed-Loop Endovascular Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Evoked Response Sensing.Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Automated 3D segmentation of human vagus nerve fascicles and epineurium from micro-computed tomography images using anatomy-aware neural networks.Journal of neural engineering · 2026Article
- A novel workflow for 3D imaging and spatial analysis of nerves in bone.Bone reports · 2025Article
- Control of spatiotemporal activation of organ-specific fibers in the swine vagus nerve by intermittent interferential current stimulation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Recent advances in facilitating the translation of bioelectronic medicine therapies.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Computational modeling of autonomic nerve stimulation: Vagus et al.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Laterality, sexual dimorphism, and human vagal projectome heterogeneity shape neuromodulation to vagus nerve stimulation.Communications biology · 2024Article
- 3D fascicular reconstruction of median and ulnar nerve: initial experience and comparison between high-resolution ultrasound and MR microscopy.European radiology experimental · 2024Article
- NerveTracker: a Python-based software toolkit for visualizing and tracking groups of nerve fibers in serial block-face microscopy with ultraviolet surface excitation images.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Phosphotungstic Acid Staining to Visualize the Vagus Nerve Perineurium Using Micro-CT.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: MicroCT of the three-dimensional fascicular organization of the human vagus nerve provides essential data to inform basic anatomy as well as the development and optimization of neuromodulation therapies. To process the images into usable formats for subsequent analysis and computational modeling, the fascicles must be segmented. Prior segmentations were completed manually due to the complex nature of the images, including variable contrast between tissue types and staining artifacts. Methods: Here, we developed a U-Net convolutional neural network (CNN) to automate segmentation of fascicles in microCT of human vagus nerve. Results: The U-Net segmentation of ~500 images spanning one cervical vagus nerve was completed in 24 s, versus ~40 h for manual segmentation, i.e., nearly four orders of magnitude faster. The automated segmentations had a Dice coefficient of 0.87, a measure of pixel-wise accuracy, thus suggesting a rapid and accurate segmentation. While Dice coefficients are a commonly used metric to assess segmentation performance, we also adapted a metric to assess fascicle-wise detection accuracy, which showed that our network accurately detects the majority of fascicles, but may under-detect smaller fascicles. Discussion: This network and the associated performance metrics set a benchmark, using a standard U-Net CNN, for the application of deep-learning algorithms to segment fascicles from microCT images. The process may be further optimized by refining tissue staining methods, modifying network architecture, and expanding the ground-truth training data. The resulting three-dimensional segmentations of the human vagus nerve will provide unprecedented accuracy to define nerve morphology in computational models for the analysis and design of neuromodulation therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.