Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37332862›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Deep-learning segmentation of fascicles from microCT of the human vagus nerve.

Ozge N Buyukcelik, Maryse Lapierre-Landry, Chaitanya Kolluru, Aniruddha R Upadhye, Daniel P Marshall, Nicole A Pelot, Kip A Ludwig, Kenneth J Gustafson, David L Wilson, Michael W Jenkins and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Computational modeling of autonomic nerve stimulation: Vagus et al.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Phosphotungstic Acid Staining to Visualize the Vagus Nerve Perineurium Using Micro-CT.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ozge N BuyukcelikDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Maryse Lapierre-LandryDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Chaitanya KolluruDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Aniruddha R UpadhyeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Daniel P MarshallDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Nicole A PelotDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Kip A LudwigDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Kenneth J GustafsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
David L WilsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Michael W JenkinsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Andrew J ShoffstallDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Case Western Reserve University · USDuke University · USLouis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

RECONSTRUCTING VAGAL ANATOMY75N98022C00018 · OD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI SHOFFSTALL, ANDREW · 2022 to 2024
$15.8M
Modeling Activation and Block of Autonomic Nerves for Analysis and DesignOT2OD025340 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GRILL, WARREN M. · 2017 to 2021
$5.9M
NIH HHS 75N98022C00018NIH HHS OT2 OD025340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: MicroCT of the three-dimensional fascicular organization of the human vagus nerve provides essential data to inform basic anatomy as well as the development and optimization of neuromodulation therapies. To process the images into usable formats for subsequent analysis and computational modeling, the fascicles must be segmented. Prior segmentations were completed manually due to the complex nature of the images, including variable contrast between tissue types and staining artifacts. Methods: Here, we developed a U-Net convolutional neural network (CNN) to automate segmentation of fascicles in microCT of human vagus nerve. Results: The U-Net segmentation of ~500 images spanning one cervical vagus nerve was completed in 24 s, versus ~40 h for manual segmentation, i.e., nearly four orders of magnitude faster. The automated segmentations had a Dice coefficient of 0.87, a measure of pixel-wise accuracy, thus suggesting a rapid and accurate segmentation. While Dice coefficients are a commonly used metric to assess segmentation performance, we also adapted a metric to assess fascicle-wise detection accuracy, which showed that our network accurately detects the majority of fascicles, but may under-detect smaller fascicles. Discussion: This network and the associated performance metrics set a benchmark, using a standard U-Net CNN, for the application of deep-learning algorithms to segment fascicles from microCT images. The process may be further optimized by refining tissue staining methods, modifying network architecture, and expanding the ground-truth training data. The resulting three-dimensional segmentations of the human vagus nerve will provide unprecedented accuracy to define nerve morphology in computational models for the analysis and design of neuromodulation therapies.

Indexed as

autonomic nervous systemdeep-learning segmentation of vagus nerveimage processingmicroCTneural networksegmentationvagus nerve

Identifiers

PMID37332862
PMCPMC10275336
OpenAlexW4381158022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.