Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37332859›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2023

A comprehensive review on motion trajectory reconstruction for EEG-based brain-computer interface.

Pengpai Wang, Xuhao Cao, Yueying Zhou, Peiliang Gong, Muhammad Yousefnezhad, Wei Shao, Daoqiang Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pengpai WangKey Laboratory of Brain-Machine Intelligence Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, MIIT Key Laboratory of Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Nanjing, China.
Xuhao CaoKey Laboratory of Brain-Machine Intelligence Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, MIIT Key Laboratory of Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Nanjing, China.
Yueying ZhouKey Laboratory of Brain-Machine Intelligence Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, MIIT Key Laboratory of Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Nanjing, China.
Peiliang GongKey Laboratory of Brain-Machine Intelligence Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, MIIT Key Laboratory of Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Nanjing, China.
Muhammad YousefnezhadKey Laboratory of Brain-Machine Intelligence Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, MIIT Key Laboratory of Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Nanjing, China.
Wei ShaoKey Laboratory of Brain-Machine Intelligence Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, MIIT Key Laboratory of Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Nanjing, China.
Daoqiang ZhangKey Laboratory of Brain-Machine Intelligence Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, MIIT Key Laboratory of Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advance in neuroscience and computer technology over the past decades have made brain-computer interface (BCI) a most promising area of neurorehabilitation and neurophysiology research. Limb motion decoding has gradually become a hot topic in the field of BCI. Decoding neural activity related to limb movement trajectory is considered to be of great help to the development of assistive and rehabilitation strategies for motor-impaired users. Although a variety of decoding methods have been proposed for limb trajectory reconstruction, there does not yet exist a review that covers the performance evaluation of these decoding methods. To alleviate this vacancy, in this paper, we evaluate EEG-based limb trajectory decoding methods regarding their advantages and disadvantages from a variety of perspectives. Specifically, we first introduce the differences in motor execution and motor imagery in limb trajectory reconstruction with different spaces (2D and 3D). Then, we discuss the limb motion trajectory reconstruction methods including experiment paradigm, EEG pre-processing, feature extraction and selection, decoding methods, and result evaluation. Finally, we expound on the open problem and future outlooks.

Indexed as

brain-computer interfaceEEGmotion executionmotion imagerytrajectory reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID37332859
PMCPMC10272365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.