Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37332792›Full record

ReviewACS omega2023

Tools of the Trade: Image Analysis Programs for Confocal Laser-Scanning Microscopy Studies of Biofilms and Considerations for Their Use by Experimental Researchers.

Shreeya Mhade, Karishma S Kaushik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. UnderstandingMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  6. Antibiofilm and antibacterial effects ofBiomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shreeya MhadeDepartment of Biotechnology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune 411007, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3050-802X
Karishma S KaushikDepartment of Biotechnology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune 411007, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5131-1798

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CLSM) is the bedrock of the microscopic visualization of biofilms. Previous applications of CLSM in biofilm studies have largely focused on observations of bacterial or fungal elements of biofilms, often seen as aggregates or mats of cells. However, the field of biofilm research is moving beyond qualitative observations alone, toward the quantitative analysis of the structural and functional features of biofilms, across clinical, environmental, and laboratory conditions. In recent times, several image analysis programs have been developed to extract and quantify biofilm properties from confocal micrographs. These tools not only vary in their scope and relevance to the specific biofilm features under study but also with respect to the user interface, compatibility with operating systems, and raw image requirements. Understanding these considerations is important when selecting tools for quantitative biofilm analysis, including at the initial experimental stages of image acquisition. In this review, we provide an overview of image analysis programs for confocal micrographs of biofilms, with a focus on tool selection and image acquisition parameters that are relevant for experimental researchers to ensure reliability and compatibility with downstream image processing.

Identifiers

PMID37332792
PMCPMC10268615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.