Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37332784›Full record

ArticleACS omega2023

Machine Learning-Enabled Optimization of Interstitial Fluid Collection via a Sweeping Microneedle Design.

Ceren Tarar, Erdal Aydın, Ali K Yetisen, Savas Tasoglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. AI-Based Metamaterial Design.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ceren TararDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkey.
Erdal AydınDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkey.
Ali K YetisenDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0896-267X
Savas TasogluKoc University Is Bank Artificial Intelligence Lab (KUIS AILab), Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4604-217X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microneedles (MNs) allow for biological fluid sampling and drug delivery toward the development of minimally invasive diagnostics and treatment in medicine. MNs have been fabricated based on empirical data such as mechanical testing, and their physical parameters have been optimized through the trial-and-error method. While these methods showed adequate results, the performance of MNs can be enhanced by analyzing a large data set of parameters and their respective performance using artificial intelligence. In this study, finite element methods (FEMs) and machine learning (ML) models were integrated to determine the optimal physical parameters for a MN design in order to maximize the amount of collected fluid. The fluid behavior in a MN patch is simulated with several different physical and geometrical parameters using FEM, and the resulting data set is used as the input for ML algorithms including multiple linear regression, random forest regression, support vector regression, and neural networks. Decision tree regression (DTR) yielded the best prediction of optimal parameters. ML modeling methods can be utilized to optimize the geometrical design parameters of MNs in wearable devices for application in point-of-care diagnostics and targeted drug delivery.

Identifiers

PMID37332784
PMCPMC10268608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.