ArticleACS omega2023
Machine Learning-Enabled Optimization of Interstitial Fluid Collection via a Sweeping Microneedle Design.
Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Wearable Sensing Technologies for the Management of Cancer, Diabetes, and COVID-19.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Optimizing Solid Microneedle Design: A Comprehensive ML-Augmented DOE Approach.ACS measurement science au · 2024Article
- AI-Based Metamaterial Design.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Review
- Advancements in microneedle fabrication techniques: artificial intelligence assisted 3D-printing technology.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microneedles (MNs) allow for biological fluid sampling and drug delivery toward the development of minimally invasive diagnostics and treatment in medicine. MNs have been fabricated based on empirical data such as mechanical testing, and their physical parameters have been optimized through the trial-and-error method. While these methods showed adequate results, the performance of MNs can be enhanced by analyzing a large data set of parameters and their respective performance using artificial intelligence. In this study, finite element methods (FEMs) and machine learning (ML) models were integrated to determine the optimal physical parameters for a MN design in order to maximize the amount of collected fluid. The fluid behavior in a MN patch is simulated with several different physical and geometrical parameters using FEM, and the resulting data set is used as the input for ML algorithms including multiple linear regression, random forest regression, support vector regression, and neural networks. Decision tree regression (DTR) yielded the best prediction of optimal parameters. ML modeling methods can be utilized to optimize the geometrical design parameters of MNs in wearable devices for application in point-of-care diagnostics and targeted drug delivery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.