Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37332775›Full record

ArticleACS omega2023

Mono- and Multicomponent Biosorption of Caffeine and Salicylic Acid onto Processed Cape Gooseberry Husk Agri-Food Waste.

Jehan Abdel Salam, Amina A Saleh, Toqa Taha El Nenaiey, Hu Yang, Tamer Shoeib, Mayyada M H El-Sayed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jehan Abdel SalamDepartment of Chemistry, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, AUC Avenue, P.O. Box 74, New Cairo, 11835 Cairo, Egypt.
Amina A SalehDepartment of Chemistry, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, AUC Avenue, P.O. Box 74, New Cairo, 11835 Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0631-517X
Toqa Taha El NenaieyDepartment of Chemistry, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, AUC Avenue, P.O. Box 74, New Cairo, 11835 Cairo, Egypt.
Hu YangState Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5779-1833
Tamer ShoeibDepartment of Chemistry, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, AUC Avenue, P.O. Box 74, New Cairo, 11835 Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3512-1593
Mayyada M H El-SayedDepartment of Chemistry, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, AUC Avenue, P.O. Box 74, New Cairo, 11835 Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6257-5748

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an increasing need to find cost-effective and sustainable solutions for treating wastewater from contaminants of emerging concern (CECs). In this regard, cape gooseberry husk-typically an agri-food waste-is investigated for the first time as a potential biosorbent for the removal of model pharmaceutical contaminants of caffeine (CA) and salicylic acid (SA) from water. Three different preparations of husks were investigated and characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller analysis, zeta potential, and point of zero charge measurements. The activation of the husk led to an increase in the surface area, pore volume, average pore size, and adsorption favorability. The single-component adsorption of SA and CA onto the three husks was investigated at different initial concentrations and pH values to determine the optimal operating conditions. The maximal removal efficiencies of SA and CA reached up to 85 and 63%, respectively, for the optimal husk which also offers a less energy-intensive option in its activation. This husk also exhibited high rates of adsorption that exceeded other husk preparations by up to four times. It was proposed that CA interacts electrostatically with the husk, while SA binds through weak physical interactions (e.g., van der Waals and H-bonding). In binary systems, CA adsorption was highly favored over SA adsorption, owing to its electrostatic interactions. The selectivity coefficients α

Identifiers

PMID37332775
PMCPMC10268614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.